* svwaitup != sv start
@ 2006-04-06 20:16 Alex Efros
2006-05-04 7:10 ` Gerrit Pape
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alex Efros @ 2006-04-06 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi!
I found some differences between `svwaitup` logic and `sv start`:
1) I don't see a way how to "wait until service will be up and running
for at least X seconds". This lead to race condition error, for example
if we have this in /service/getty-tty5/run:
#!/bin/sh
/etc/setfont tty5
exit
exec /sbin/agetty 38400 tty5 linux
and then will run `sv start getty-tty5` a couple of times we will see
some success and some failures.
2) If ./finish is running now, `sv start` will report service as running,
but this is wrong. (I've "sleep 3" in ./finish for XWindow service, to
prevent X from restarting too fast.)
Any ideas how to use `sv start` to make it as reliable as `svwaitup` was?
--
WBR, Alex.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: svwaitup != sv start
2006-04-06 20:16 svwaitup != sv start Alex Efros
@ 2006-05-04 7:10 ` Gerrit Pape
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gerrit Pape @ 2006-05-04 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:16:47PM +0300, Alex Efros wrote:
> I found some differences between `svwaitup` logic and `sv start`:
>
> 1) I don't see a way how to "wait until service will be up and running
> for at least X seconds". This lead to race condition error, for example
> if we have this in /service/getty-tty5/run:
> #!/bin/sh
> /etc/setfont tty5
> exit
> exec /sbin/agetty 38400 tty5 linux
> and then will run `sv start getty-tty5` a couple of times we will see
> some success and some failures.
The sv program utilizes the ./check script in service directories for
this purpose. After all it's always a race condition, the service
daemon can terminate just at the time it is considered to be up and
running, and reported so.
> 2) If ./finish is running now, `sv start` will report service as running,
> but this is wrong. (I've "sleep 3" in ./finish for XWindow service, to
> prevent X from restarting too fast.)
I've fixed that in 1.5.0.
> Any ideas how to use `sv start` to make it as reliable as `svwaitup` was?
I suggest to try to provide an appropriate ./check script for this
service.
Thanks, Gerrit.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-04 7:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-06 20:16 svwaitup != sv start Alex Efros
2006-05-04 7:10 ` Gerrit Pape
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).