supervision - discussion about system services, daemon supervision, init, runlevel management, and tools such as s6 and runit
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin <spamite@ev1.net>
Subject: Re: Should svwaitup/down be built again, or how to make sv do this?
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:56:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607171256.14899.spamite@ev1.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060713084421.7943.qmail@0c0c26b6d83f02.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1365 bytes --]

On Thursday 13 July 2006 03:44, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > We cannot make sv block like svwaitup did.  Either we're
> > misunderstanding how to use it, or something.
> >
> > An example service script is included below:
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > svwaitup ~/service/sfsagent
> > exec chpst -e env runthis.sh
>
> svwaitup did wait two seconds by default after the sfsagent service
> daemon has been started, this seems to be what you relied on.  Indeed,
> sv doesn't do that by default, but it supports the ./check script
> instead.

svwaitup waited until the service had been running for at least 2 seconds 
before exiting, no?


> If you want 'sv start ~/service/sfsagent' or 'sv check
> ~/service/sfsagent' to wait for two seconds before returning, simply do
> 'sleep 2' in ~/service/sfsagent/check.

That would be a useless check.  What we want is for the sfsagent service 
to be running, not just wait 2 seconds before starting.

> Better yet, find out how to check for what the sfsagent service daemon
> needs to provide before runthis.sh can be started, and check for that
> in ~/service/sfsagent/check.

So, it sounds like you're saying that the functionality of checking for a 
service to be running, and waiting until that service is running before 
continuing no longer exists in runit as it is presently built.  Is this 
correct?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-17 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-12  1:59 Kevin
2006-07-12 15:20 ` Gerrit Pape
2006-07-12 16:27   ` Kevin
2006-07-13  8:44     ` Gerrit Pape
2006-07-17 17:56       ` Kevin [this message]
2006-07-17 19:32         ` Stefan Karrmann
2006-07-18  8:38         ` Uffe Jakobsen
2006-07-19 18:46           ` Kevin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200607171256.14899.spamite@ev1.net \
    --to=spamite@ev1.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).