From: Alex Efros <powerman@powerman.asdfGroup.com>
Subject: Re: Option for runsv/runsvdir to specify how many times to restart a service in a certain time period before giving up?
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:30:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061030123019.GA30814@home.power> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061030121321.GA27602@fly.srk.fer.hr>
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:13:21PM +0100, Dra?en Ka?ar wrote:
> Sure, but if something's a common need for a large group of users, then
> they call it a feature. Some of those who don't need such feature call it
> a bloat, but I don't think that's a valid argument.
No. Bloat isn't equal to 'new feature'. Bloated software isn't equal to
feature-rich software. But if software has wrong features added in wrong
places (from architecture view) then it's become bloated very quickly.
Maybe it's good idea to include additional script in runit package (or
distribute it separately) which can be used from ./finish script this way:
# add 5 minutes timeout if service was started 5 times in last 10 sec
restart-timeout --interval 10 --tries 5 300
But adding this functionality to runit is a bad idea just because you
already can develop that restart-timeout script using current runit,
and adding this feature to runit doesn't provide any additional gains.
After all, it's a Unix Way.
--
WBR, Alex.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-30 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-28 19:26 Alex Smith
2006-10-30 10:49 ` Alex Efros
2006-10-30 10:50 ` Alex Efros
2006-10-30 12:13 ` Dražen Kačar
2006-10-30 12:30 ` Alex Efros [this message]
2006-10-30 13:38 ` Laurent Bercot
2006-10-30 13:42 ` Alex Efros
2006-10-30 13:58 ` Laurent Bercot
2006-10-30 14:24 ` Alex Efros
2006-10-30 14:51 ` Charlie Brady
2006-10-31 0:48 ` Laurent Bercot
2006-10-30 18:49 ` Vincent Danen
2006-10-30 21:28 ` Alex Efros
2006-10-30 21:30 ` Vincent Danen
2006-10-30 17:52 ` Alex Smith
2006-10-30 21:41 ` Alex Efros
2006-11-01 12:01 ` Gerrit Pape
2006-11-01 12:17 ` Alex Efros
2006-10-30 18:49 ` Dražen Kačar
2006-10-30 22:03 ` Alex Efros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061030123019.GA30814@home.power \
--to=powerman@powerman.asdfgroup.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).