From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1310
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general
Subject: Re: sv restart bug?
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:10:07 +0000
Message-ID: <20061101121007.22663.qmail@87e16a6bac1ed0.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>
References: <20061024173834.GB14227@fly.srk.fer.hr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162383005 21296 80.91.229.2 (1 Nov 2006 12:10:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: supervision-return-1546-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Wed Nov 01 13:10:01 2006
Return-path: <supervision-return-1546-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org>
Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org
Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14])
	by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GfEuf-00041o-Pu
	for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:09:46 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 21049 invoked by uid 76); 1 Nov 2006 12:10:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.skarnet.org/lists/>
Original-Received: (qmail 21044 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2006 12:10:07 -0000
Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Mail-Followup-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20061024173834.GB14227@fly.srk.fer.hr>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1310
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1310>

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 07:38:34PM +0200, Dra?en Ka?ar wrote:
> I think I've found a small bug in runit 1.7.0.
> 
> "sv restart <service>" prints out status information describing state
> before restart action. For example:
> 
> {donat}~# sv stop inserter
> ok: down: inserter: 0s, normally up
> {donat}~# sv status inserter
> down: inserter: 6s, normally up
> {donat}~# sv restart inserter
> ok: down: inserter: 13s, normally up      <=====
> {donat}~# sv status inserter 
> run: inserter: (pid 9437) 4s
> 
> 
> It seems to me it should have printed the new state, just like "sv start"
> does:
> 
> {donat}~# sv stop inserter 
> ok: down: inserter: 0s, normally up
> {donat}~# sv start inserter
> ok: run: inserter: (pid 9539) 0s

Yes, that looks like a bug, thanks for reporting.  From a first quick
glance it seems 'restart' lets sv send the commands 'term', 'cont', 'up'
-in that order-, and sv checks for 'term' to take effect instead of
'up'.

Regards, Gerrit.