From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1338 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alex Efros Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: graceful restart under runit Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:31:20 +0200 Organization: asdfGroup Inc., http://powerman.asdfGroup.com/ Message-ID: <20061118123120.GA8388@home.power> References: <20061115114754.GA3759@fly.srk.fer.hr> <20061115160850.GA26987@home.power> <20061116152446.GA4721@fly.srk.fer.hr> <20061117001519.GA652@home.power> <20061117133435.GB2153@home.power> <20061118002245.GB17975@home.power> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163853089 5257 80.91.229.2 (18 Nov 2006 12:31:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: supervision-return-1574-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Sat Nov 18 13:31:28 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GlPLv-0005VT-9o for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:31:23 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 30289 invoked by uid 76); 18 Nov 2006 12:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 30283 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2006 12:31:43 -0000 Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Mail-Followup-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1338 Archived-At: Hi! On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:34:18PM -0500, Charlie Brady wrote: > Not as I understand it. SO_REUSEADDR will allow the socket to be reused > when in TIME_WAIT state. It won't allow multiple processes to bind to the > socket and listen to connections. Yep, looks like you right. Looks like I've confused this case and case when process with listening socket doing fork and so result in two listening sockets for same ip/port in two different processes. -- WBR, Alex.