From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1517 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alex Efros Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runit not collecting zombies Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:57:31 +0300 Organization: asdfGroup Inc., http://powerman.asdfGroup.com/ Message-ID: <20070913105731.GL12043@home.power> References: <20070716000927.GY23517@home.power> <47939.::ffff:77.75.72.5.1189601606.squirrel@mail.podgorny.cz> <20070912143557.GC12043@home.power> <20070912150047.GD12043@home.power> <35517.::ffff:77.75.72.5.1189613042.squirrel@mail.podgorny.cz> <20070912170450.GE12043@home.power> <50411.::ffff:77.75.72.5.1189673890.squirrel@mail.podgorny.cz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189681055 15328 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2007 10:57:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:57:35 +0000 (UTC) To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-1752-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Thu Sep 13 12:57:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IVmO5-00041h-FO for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:57:33 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 29821 invoked by uid 76); 13 Sep 2007 10:57:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 29815 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2007 10:57:54 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50411.::ffff:77.75.72.5.1189673890.squirrel@mail.podgorny.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1517 Archived-At: Hi! On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:58:10AM +0200, Radek Podgorny wrote: > * I don't use hardened at all so I think this is not to be blamed. > * It is not a 2.6.20 kernel bug as I experience this on 2.6.19.1 and even > something like 2.6.18 (can't look right now). I got this issue first time on 2.6.16 (hardened packages released with some delay). > * All my kernels are vanilla. > * The only two systems that run fine may be fucked up, too. One of them is > a laptop so the uptime may be too short to notice. The other one has > uptime of something like 160 days so it may screw up on next reboot. Hmm. Can you reboot that system with 160 days update, just to be sure it is have sense this compare it to other systems? > What about CFLAGS? I'll get them from my machines and post them. I suspect > they are mostly -O3 and arch set to specific processor (not generic i686 > or so)... Hardened insists on very stable CFLAGS. My servers/workstation: CFLAGS="-march=pentium-m -O2 -pipe" CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe" CFLAGS="-march=k8 -O2 -pipe -fforce-addr" Server without zombie issue: CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -pipe -ftracer -fprefetch-loop-arrays" > Maybe it's some kind of time overflow bug, can you find when did you start > experiencing the trouble? Time overflow? In 2-10 days? Don't think so. Important question: do you recompile overall system after upgrading any of toolchain packages (linux-headers/glibc/gcc/binutils)? I see you're using newer gcc (4.x.x), but do you recompiled everything with it? P.S. I think it's time to try sysvinit for me. -- WBR, Alex.