From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1614
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Bernhard Graf <list-supervision@augensalat.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general
Subject: Re: using runit as init
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:58:32 +0100
Message-ID: <200801110858.33026.list-supervision@augensalat.de>
References: <200801032151.21524.list-supervision@augensalat.de> <200801101020.51580.list-supervision@augensalat.de> <200801101306.24837.mike@geekgene.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200038324 12081 80.91.229.12 (11 Jan 2008 07:58:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:58:44 +0000 (UTC)
To: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Original-X-From: supervision-return-1849-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Fri Jan 11 08:59:05 2008
Return-path: <supervision-return-1849-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org>
Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org
Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14])
	by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JDEn7-0004TF-E0
	for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:59:01 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 14051 invoked by uid 76); 11 Jan 2008 07:58:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.skarnet.org/lists/>
Original-Received: (qmail 14045 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2008 07:58:43 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
In-Reply-To: <200801101306.24837.mike@geekgene.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1614
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1614>

Mike Buland wrote:

It seems you simply refuse the actual point of the discussion I started:

My goal is not to make runit like SysV init.

My goal is to replace init by something that supervises daemon processes 
in the sense of daemontools.

The discourse is about the way to that goal.

And of course about shortcomings in runit / other init system / the 
daemontools concept as process 1 in general. This should be allowed 
without making someone feel defensive.
-- 
Bernhard Graf