From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1626 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Buland Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: using runit as init Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:52:15 -0700 Organization: Geek Gene Message-ID: <200801131152.15148.mike@geekgene.com> References: <200801032151.21524.list-supervision@augensalat.de> <200801110730.09851.mike@geekgene.com> <200801121118.53450.list-supervision@augensalat.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200250476 11930 80.91.229.12 (13 Jan 2008 18:54:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:54:36 +0000 (UTC) To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-1861-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Sun Jan 13 19:54:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JE7yu-0004Qg-96 for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:54:52 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 18122 invoked by uid 76); 13 Jan 2008 18:54:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 18116 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2008 18:54:34 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 In-Reply-To: <200801121118.53450.list-supervision@augensalat.de> Content-Disposition: inline Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1626 Archived-At: If you don't mind, since I am actually interested, would you explain to me why you think I'm wrong. Really about your solution for porting scripts not leveraging any of the advantages of runit. If we can actually make runit better, I'm for it. I'm just not yet convinced that any suggestions so far would help (insofar as increasing flexibility, adding features, and not overcomplicating). --Mike On Saturday 12 January 2008 03:18:51 am Bernhard Graf wrote: > Mike Buland wrote: > > yes, you're completely right. I'm sorry. I do overstate and come > > off as a jerk sometimes, most times, maybe... > > I think you are overstating ... ;-) > > But nevermind. The whole thread gave me some valuable input. > > > Fortunately, I don't have one run script that's more than 4 or 5 > > lines, and most of that is whitespace :) > > Lucky you. > You don't run mysql, do you?