From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1676 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Laurent Bercot Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: About spam (was: Usenet Group dead?) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:47:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20080331074754.GA26579@skarnet.org> References: <20080329185939.3273f0f2@gmail.com> <20080329232304.GC28507@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206949664 11833 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2008 07:47:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:47:44 +0000 (UTC) To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-1911-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Mon Mar 31 09:48:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JgEkZ-0005UB-2G for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:48:15 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 27679 invoked by uid 76); 31 Mar 2008 07:47:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 27673 invoked by uid 1000); 31 Mar 2008 07:47:54 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080329232304.GC28507@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1676 Archived-At: > No. It just works. Absolutely. :) Also, about the spam... I'm sorry. I thought about it for a while, but I really can't bring myself to implement per-message-confirmation, like on DJB's lists; it seems to me it would be more inconvenient for the users than the occasional spam message getting through. It certainly would be more inconvenient to me. With enough opinions, I can be talked into doing it, though. -- Laurent