From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1975 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Miller Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Configuration services Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:22:04 -0500 Message-ID: <20090726162204.GA19230@pretender.frop.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248625337 27422 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2009 16:22:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:22:17 +0000 (UTC) To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-2210-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Sun Jul 26 18:22:10 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MV6UE-0002nn-K8 for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:22:10 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 6440 invoked by uid 76); 26 Jul 2009 16:23:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 6430 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2009 16:23:24 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=frop.net; b=WP7D0sNMGeCMcu1t97VY1oQLRU9MGKEM7Cedcb0BMOWXMg9B8B0JnFi1bP9K8HDZlW+qF0cuu2+JZKLiIfF/b2lqqFcwsmH0+HYjpvPl+KSz8XfQJZ6ajomosqfVt7/7I1jWrzii4uL67MbhvWSwoTR2eh93V26GfGwy3UReKNE= ; Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1975 Archived-At: Hi, does anyone use services that just set up some things but don't actually run a daemon? This is hinted at http://smarden.org/pape/djb/daemontools/noinit.html. Solaris does things like this with their SMF system and what they call "checkpoints". I am doing this with runit by putting a while ./check; do; sleep 300; done; loop in the run script. Is there a better way? -- David Miller dave@frop.net http://dave.frop.net/