From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/2089 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wayne Marshall Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: [announce] perp-2.03: persistent process supervision Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:43:09 +0100 Organization: b0llix.net: un!x for the deranged Message-ID: <20110314194309.11ead71d@b0llix.net> References: <20110314113933.3544df05@b0llix.net> <20110314131706.GA17316@skarnet.org> <20110314150225.7cf61c3c@b0llix.net> <4D7E24DA.2030404@robinbowes.com> <20110314153425.34ed16dc@b0llix.net> <20110314164741.GA7248@skarnet.org> <20110314183924.4dc40065@b0llix.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300128219 5634 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2011 18:43:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: supervision@list.skarnet.org To: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Original-X-From: supervision-return-2323-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Mon Mar 14 19:43:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzCjt-0000VH-JT for gcsg-supervision@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:43:33 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 24020 invoked by uid 76); 14 Mar 2011 18:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 24012 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 18:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64--netbsd) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:2089 Archived-At: On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:52:58 -0400 prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) wrote: > Wayne Marshall wrote: > > It is like worrying, what if init(8) should die? > > If process 1 dies, the system halts, and we reboot it. But > perpd doesn't run as process 1, right? So if it did receive > SIGKILL, for whatever reason, it's not so obvious what would > happen. > It is as deterministic as if svscan is SIGKILLed: the system is unstable. Wayne