From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/2838 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Steve Litt Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: State of skarnet.org projects Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:07:25 -0500 Message-ID: <20200202090725.5a7d837c@mydesk.domain.cxm> References: <1760736f-f479-4fc3-256d-a4cad4d5772f@obarun.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="56382"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-2427-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane-mx.org@list.skarnet.org Sun Feb 02 15:07:33 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from alyss.skarnet.org ([95.142.172.232]) by ciao.gmane.io with smtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iyFuP-000EUi-0H for gcsg-supervision@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 15:07:33 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 24824 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2020 14:07:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm Original-Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Original-Received: (qmail 24817 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2020 14:07:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; h=X-Originating-IP:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; s=default; d=troubleshooters.com; b=PULMMmTpksxl4vDTxe4pTCZBlnDMlZAkVns93H0F2wrReIEJd5oC5Unru/ETeWFkHam8GBzyj9pRy3tYa21r0FV1EJTII4sw9f0lSWUJe1Frtg5lWrOi9Yi0gHN+x826vOIo2CnNg0Ciq6sN2CQ3GB53qU0GtbyJOUvFUKMui9I=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=troubleshooters.com; s=default; t=1580652446; bh=FopYmQ5lpPdXNFDziyNQtre2lH0=; l=1217; h=X-Originating-IP:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=l/kl4HEFXVsUjDnEUtur0xS+oh9dGuSXzEiepSh5kU3RRAix6xtEcNkuDNLZGYd4L Ay6W7T3GXJaRiOszHWL9XTI4eiDy0pAegLk923A6iBKHyuUs5c+dY0WQKPsx1Z4SvM Imo15kOupO2UQIs6E2/+KJi0DEpFHEwXUj350auc= X-Originating-IP: [72.188.224.222] In-Reply-To: <1760736f-f479-4fc3-256d-a4cad4d5772f@obarun.org> Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:2838 Archived-At: On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:34:05 +0200 fungal-net wrote: > Void is also > very close, I for one use it with s6 and 66 for a while now and in > many ways being more carefree than obarun having fast balls thrown by > arch daily. Have you, or are you going to, write documentation on how to install and maintain s6 (and presumably s6-rc) on Void? Are you using Void's s6* packages, or do you compile the stuff yourself? If you install Void's s6* packages, does that remove runit? I'd like to have both, to a/b them against each other and to more quickly learn s6*. It seems trivial to me to deploy s6 stage 2 and migrate all my runit stage2 to s6 stage 2. However, migrating stage 1 sounds to me like an Einsteinian task. Runit's stage 1 repeatedly loops through .d directories in what I find to be an unobvious way. It seems to me that Void is getting more popular every day, and Void could serve as a Rosetta Stone between runit and s6. I'd appreciate any documentation you have or will write in the future concerning your use of s6* on Void. Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt February 2020 featured book: Thriving in Tough Times http://www.troubleshooters.com/thrive