From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/2913 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: innerspacepilot Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runit SIGPWR support Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 23:09:09 +0300 Message-ID: <2f4de891-1ce3-2946-c70a-bcb878118981@gmx.com> References: <1f198ed8-3682-26cd-e8d5-2efc412afde2@gmx.com> <18110531581952419@sas8-7ec005b03c91.qloud-c.yandex.net> <7003111582476686@vla3-6a5326aeb4ee.qloud-c.yandex.net> <77a6d0d5-f292-b225-e9b9-77c290394b47@gmx.com> <20200224152617.GA28493@mail.hallyn.com> <5f5e0473-4ed1-58c0-26af-2eabf43232b0@gmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="13241"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-2502-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane-mx.org@list.skarnet.org Fri Mar 06 21:14:19 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from alyss.skarnet.org ([95.142.172.232]) by ciao.gmane.io with smtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jAJMQ-0003Mc-6k for gcsg-supervision@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 21:14:18 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 368 invoked by uid 89); 6 Mar 2020 20:14:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm Original-Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Original-Received: (qmail 361 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2020 20:14:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1583525654; bh=iLdTIpMFKtuRsvhPSsK30saaFrd3x4nkRsRg3q0rlPs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=RW2fnuZgrCsahzxl5BV11cP06GCsJXYkr7p7SueF5ET7Dv6F9f7lTO/TbQFh4c3W5 1EEAtZhDmwYXDTYail5YsDHWFQMv047zI9jLhVpTvAHoetKKBa2JzbgEmSaKvPpv57 MSYxcflyvE4VPIUAkYrx6VZoY3xKvUBYdzqpJ9pw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ii/ZKVMHT/dMM+wVoaX1VHexjqIRjT2F4jJkvRu06GIi3aQ5wX9 GQLcclC7R0mMxyy+LOMgLGMPIn2hXETtBc79fVk69BxdszgP6xGPvF5M5iV/jTA2pxwJ4u6 csIG8MqTU5xecyS087YefiNusQ0R8wfKVAcwpGJQ0dKMe+2idvc5D9e68Sulos7cDJikCmA Af0eCyChe+W5Lq4s9VHdA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:V/+fRmtRfKo=:JCah/GhJhUbltQjn2k2Vfe AXZ0aMcxBID6JTRsKnKt2rZlgZD/L2HQYJy03U4OOYZvoDX6rrAtwUsWC3yN/SdikOuarG/5O xa4+VDzaRvgceLRL+JT1CTsnIaLDClXyYbKk8QwUU5ALOgIVWW/3fdCiH/MP6MqUYH2sbmVVy GTNJktTWt590Nt08N6nv5VgzimQQ7ygEpFHn6hwB7G76nnS8yBv6y8A47EiybseZYo/LMvNez CQ3Tnf+w0V24mv3eRE58Rlb3HNbx8HLQjIcs/ttMRii2sejukrkmc2FfqWL2aFBOHOeWdEAj4 PD5Znl31CS6rHwlKRhhq2uf0t7pjbqbM2LF3nKZOsN3Wdtq/CKWpYHnUDAmB6WddDwyiBq/IU +yQvndH1bOMkQOPagEkms2augtkT65Ny81A5unD+LU33walhBy9cnBn8xSd8xIJ9SrAgGTwTX I3HcJGJfuwyNm6ikLzNyLHPy/Y6NkK/aGHYB0opWbP2I6gAD0QR5vhYWhDl6NxEo2Zh5Wc4xb sh3qBdHsKxgkHrBECxd2vFFYlXtTIeJTlxq5IiZy2Dd2YO5jQM+BVFX0W+wNa/E0tChJCfBZ3 wiCJhrMCcvPaMtOHmPv3Tm+4ZckpqzBRKEgfxTW2hMbS4nQEte3mf7FSaySzLBuQFlhaAK2GX 7K2IjC/M07TT+3CdMFisITbJsPwJ2F4rW2/Tho2ZnWbHf9gXl83R0am5YNbiob3Q+reZXygy8 Zo3qkxyYp1jmS9a/U17XX+BgaBqOpXZt3XfYoEz+fsn2fw4EKT4DHPbAQ7xah/b+dGnDJGwL Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:2913 Archived-At: On 29.02.2020 21:20, Guillermo wrote: > El mi=C3=A9., 26 feb. 2020 a las 5:07, innerspacepilot escribi=C3=B3: >> I have checked openrc and busybox - both support SIGPWR. > BusyBox init does support SIGPWR, it is equivalent to SIGUSR1, the > signal sent by the 'halt' applet. However, if by "openrc" you mean > openrc-init running as process 1, then no, it does not support SIGPWR. > At least, not openrc-init from upstream OpenRC. It only reacts to > SIGINT (reboot) and SIGCHLD (reap). And if OpenRC is used only as a > service manager, behaviour of SIGPWR will be defined by the program > that happens to be running as process 1. > > G. Yes, I mean "support" in context of current discussion, meaning "it is mentioned in source code". thanks for your info.