From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/545 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Henrik Heil Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: svlogd -tt Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:12:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4108CDAB.1060709@zweipol.net> References: <40FD6BB6.5000902@zweipol.net> <20040728230201.GM22412@home.power> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1091095991 27396 80.91.224.253 (29 Jul 2004 10:13:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-783-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Thu Jul 29 12:13:02 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by deer.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bq7uI-0006Y4-00 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:13:02 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 23422 invoked by uid 76); 29 Jul 2004 10:13:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 23416 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2004 10:13:22 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 Thunderbird/0.7 Mnenhy/0.6.0.101 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20040728230201.GM22412@home.power> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:545 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:545 Alex Efros wrote: > You all discuss very complex things... patches... :) probably I misunderstand > this issue, but I think we already have everything we need in file timestamp, > and there is no need to convert logfile names from TAI. I know that i can use the mtime to select the logfiles. Thanks for the examples anyway. I still think that this is kind of a workaround. With the mtime approach you could argue that there is no need for a timestamp in the filenames at all. Even without mtime you could do a script that looks in all the files to select ranges. In my opinion a log processor program would the preferable solution and fit well in the runit-suite. Best regards, Henrik -- Henrik Heil, zweipol Coy & Heil GbR http://www.zweipol.net/