* svlogd / multilog -> SQL database
@ 2007-01-04 16:42 Daniel Clark
2007-01-11 16:50 ` Charlie Brady
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Clark @ 2007-01-04 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
Has anyone happened to have done any work to get svlogd/multilog data
into a SQL database, such as PostgreSQL?
I'm currently using RSyslog [1] for this, but am switching over to
runit/svlogd for a bunch of services, and also would prefer PostgreSQL
to MySQL (rsyslogd is tied somewhat tightly to MySQL)
[1] http://www.rsyslog.com/
--
Daniel Clark # http://dclark.us # http://opensysadmin.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: svlogd / multilog -> SQL database
2007-01-04 16:42 svlogd / multilog -> SQL database Daniel Clark
@ 2007-01-11 16:50 ` Charlie Brady
2007-02-23 13:48 ` Daniel Clark
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Charlie Brady @ 2007-01-11 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: supervision
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Daniel Clark wrote:
> Has anyone happened to have done any work to get svlogd/multilog data
> into a SQL database, such as PostgreSQL?
I think what you mean to say is, has anyone written a logger which can be
used by supervise/runit in place of svlogd/multilog. It will read from
standard input, and write log records into an SQL database.
I don't see where or why you'd use svlogd or multilog in that scenario.
[I'd be concerned about reliability and load issues.]
Alternatively, you might post-process svlogd log files into SQL (at normal
log rotation time, and from time to time otherwise), depending on what
analysis capabilities you are seeking.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: svlogd / multilog -> SQL database
2007-01-11 16:50 ` Charlie Brady
@ 2007-02-23 13:48 ` Daniel Clark
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Clark @ 2007-02-23 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: supervision
On 1/11/07, Charlie Brady <charlieb-supervision@budge.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Daniel Clark wrote:
>
> > Has anyone happened to have done any work to get svlogd/multilog data
> > into a SQL database, such as PostgreSQL?
>
> I think what you mean to say is, has anyone written a logger which can be
> used by supervise/runit in place of svlogd/multilog. It will read from
> standard input, and write log records into an SQL database.
>
> I don't see where or why you'd use svlogd or multilog in that scenario.
>
> [I'd be concerned about reliability and load issues.]
Yes, you are right; looking at this again, it seems like I would want
to use socklog (with svlogd) on the client machines to get the logs to
the central server [1]. So the question is, once this is done, what
runs on the central server to get the information into PostgreSQL?
Based on the rousing response to this thread, I'm guessing the answer
is some script I go and write myself :-)
> Alternatively, you might post-process svlogd log files into SQL (at normal
> log rotation time, and from time to time otherwise), depending on what
> analysis capabilities you are seeking.
Yes, that would probably make the most sense.
[1] http://smarden.org/socklog/network.html
Thanks for the reply,
--
Daniel Clark # http://dclark.us # http://opensysadmin.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-23 13:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-04 16:42 svlogd / multilog -> SQL database Daniel Clark
2007-01-11 16:50 ` Charlie Brady
2007-02-23 13:48 ` Daniel Clark
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).