From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/563 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Clemens Fischer" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runsv and process groups Date: 26 Aug 2004 18:27:25 +0200 Message-ID: <6575lv98.fsf@ID-23066.news.dfncis.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093537679 30962 80.91.224.253 (26 Aug 2004 16:27:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: supervision-return-801-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Thu Aug 26 18:27:37 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by deer.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C0N69-00077x-00 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:27:37 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3833 invoked by uid 76); 26 Aug 2004 16:27:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 3827 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2004 16:27:52 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: ino-qc@spotteswoode.de.eu.org via mail-out03 X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20rc3 (Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 0.675575 secs) Mail-Followup-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org In-Reply-To: (Charlie Brady's message of "Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:29:32 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (berkeley-unix) Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:563 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:563 * 2004-08-23 Charlie Brady: > On 23 Aug 2004, Clemens Fischer wrote: > >> with the current behaviour, the user can choose to give it its own >> session using "chpst -P ..." as an additional option. > > Sure, but to be safe, you need to do that in every run script. Wouldn't > it be easier for (nearly) everyone if runsv did it? for me this is about choice, but you certainly have a point. AFAIC i prefer the current way and advice in the runsv(8) documentation to add the "chpst -P ..." bit for the "default case". clemens