From: Guillermo <gdiazhartusch@gmail.com>
To: super <supervision@list.skarnet.org>
Subject: Re: killall test run
Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 17:39:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADQ2Nw99kHULnJGMuPyNaQTJKt30AoLPeCJU2OpTDzP_a3UHUg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9538981558270634@myt3-c573aa6fc782.qloud-c.yandex.net>
El dom., 19 may. 2019 a las 9:57, Jeff escribió:
>
> OpenRC is known to work with s6-svscan (this is done via the
> /libexec/rc/sh/s6.sh shell script).
That is part of OpenRC's s6 integration feature, and, although on the
surface it looks like a nice thing to have, the implementation of it
launches s6-svscan with start-stop-daemon, which means that:
* s6-svscan is not supervised.
* s6-svscan's standard output and error are redirected to /dev/null,
so logs from services that don't have a corresponding logger go to the
trash can.
Or at least it was like that last time I checked.
> although it is better to start
> s6-svscan from /etc/inittab (directly or - as i prefer - via a starter
> shell/execline script that ensures at least the scandir exists)
> since SysV init can respawn processes anyway (supervised
> supervisor ;-).
That seems to be the route that Adélie has taken. With an execline
script, /lib/s6/s6-svscanboot, configured in an /etc/inittab 'respawn'
entry. This results in a supervised s6-svscan (by sysvinit), and a
supervised catch-all logger.
> i do not know the order
> in which sysvinit processes the inittab entries for a given (SysV)
> "runlevel". do "wait" entries precede "respawn" entries, followed
> by the "once" entries ?
I believe they are processed in line order.
G.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-19 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 19:19 interesting claims Jeff
2019-04-30 2:49 ` Guillermo
2019-04-30 8:22 ` Laurent Bercot
2019-05-03 0:53 ` what init systems do you use ? Jeff
2019-05-11 18:45 ` Guillermo
2019-05-13 19:13 ` multiplexd
2019-05-13 20:36 ` Laurent Bercot
2019-05-13 21:09 ` Steve Litt
2019-05-14 2:34 ` Guillermo
2019-05-13 21:16 ` Joshua Ismael Haase Hernández
2019-05-14 5:50 ` Colin Booth
2019-05-14 7:15 ` eric vidal
2019-04-30 8:47 ` interesting claims Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
2019-05-01 7:26 ` Steve Litt
2019-05-01 7:33 ` Steve Litt
2019-05-01 18:13 ` Laurent Bercot
2019-05-15 17:22 ` Steve Litt
2019-05-15 23:22 ` Oliver Schad
2019-05-16 1:07 ` Steve Litt
2019-05-16 5:36 ` fungal-net
2019-05-16 8:32 ` Laurent Bercot
2019-05-16 17:10 ` Jeff
2019-05-17 0:23 ` Dewayne Geraghty
2019-05-17 11:21 ` fungal-net
2019-05-17 22:57 ` Guillermo
2019-05-18 0:52 ` Jeff
2019-05-18 16:26 ` fungal-net
2019-05-18 20:04 ` Guillermo
2019-05-19 11:24 ` fungal-net
2019-05-19 12:57 ` killall test run Jeff
2019-05-19 17:29 ` Colin Booth
2019-05-19 20:39 ` Guillermo [this message]
2019-05-19 23:06 ` Laurent Bercot
2019-05-19 20:35 ` interesting claims Guillermo
2019-05-03 1:37 ` how to handle system shutdown ? Jeff
2019-05-03 19:25 ` Laurent Bercot
2019-05-05 0:52 ` is it required to call kill() from process #1 ? Jeff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADQ2Nw99kHULnJGMuPyNaQTJKt30AoLPeCJU2OpTDzP_a3UHUg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gdiazhartusch@gmail.com \
--cc=supervision@list.skarnet.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).