From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 32559 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2021 01:41:39 -0000
Received: from alyss.skarnet.org (95.142.172.232)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 29 Jan 2021 01:41:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 24499 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jan 2021 01:42:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
Sender: <supervision@list.skarnet.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Id: <supervision.list.skarnet.org>
Received: (qmail 24492 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2021 01:42:02 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=4R2VJCLK+Yx/a6UcNlHqNTnZgttmgELWnWx2YfRsdm0=;
        b=SMSXwzgoaA6GM61K5crEEbfCLml4hwZfsILo/kjKFO9X5j2fAmzW9lWT8BfECu+g91
         9kbTw7PD4qSDmF2Zij3rmTSJBu8NWqxASN5OMd5ii3beyLIbBbZyJopzLjw6PRh8McC1
         ZL9aSoa1HNeDDS/joOG8VgGmBTEIhPclznophjVxySzs+cVHoP3msXp/9jZ3PRXdfR9W
         RFdXqh9JoJ/MFoMa3pcftRaOQuurjZdSaQFyHiPAPyIuJDh8vR6x7+hFWeV8uSK3Y60K
         AgcQuABRpJtD13IhdXP8zCeqkle0iehcpBv6x3DhAIsd7NiBwLrBU5Lxu5DLrrRojAc4
         I6UQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=4R2VJCLK+Yx/a6UcNlHqNTnZgttmgELWnWx2YfRsdm0=;
        b=Fc7CSrooizxeMim+CnZpbryG9m7ey1+NvcZ72C1FODbxxrr3dHeha+QZg1/V/phZBl
         ftKFowu8h4JFL5ewspo57iFuu+Ck7okji/1HqF31Im+LBP9nFf7/yfEqIWB0rXGCgsbx
         VxAJZi2hi8x/HovpnFdog6PmKlF9m5y6DiJLqFHrK0f9tmY9RrlDJvFsf/gkJpVLKvR9
         3cbrEhBoSyydNap4mObp97ki2rVS5ssGwPaPqriVOQhZFiEaGsuxpzydsAUMWTxkOFzO
         URm4OGA2mJrIvqieWpxtQbZ+/zVPA54jCPHnMdjpy7Wakm0NGYnKOY9JwLaDJsKW5+6v
         vPbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531q+w7fCVx5E10YpazuvW1A4LefBCGNOf/tJzp9s+LtCGLPvElG
	QW4wrSNHSzR9Hmhl66mS9UbhTKiMJ5V0fAqAuEAeO2I4
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzL6Wain3P4HtdtTxOCR1yhNjSfLh3tm1lSfm2v4eBkh/LSHyMQRnrH8Jdju114c8FfL9EBHDUPLwESFaVMx2Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1544:: with SMTP id j4mr1421720ilu.29.1611884494003;
 Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:41:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <YBKNJEuGeYag91Q1@CasperVector>
In-Reply-To: <YBKNJEuGeYag91Q1@CasperVector>
From: Guillermo <gdiazhartusch@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:41:24 -0300
Message-ID: <CADQ2Nw_Uhih6=G-e8wc85UMHeRur7Y36OiZJV3m=2=Q7-pdF=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Some suggestions on old-fashioned usage with s6 2.10.x
To: Supervision <supervision@list.skarnet.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

El jue, 28 ene 2021 a las 7:08, Casper Ti. Vector escribi=C3=B3:
>
> I did not actively follow the recent evolution of s6, and have just been
> bitten badly by s6 2.10.x on my Alpine servers (where slew [1] is used
> of course) when it comes along with other updates.
>
> [1] <https://gitea.com/CasperVector/slew>
> [...]
> it will be nice if the old-fashioned way (with stage 1 and stage 3 as
> static scripts) is supported as well [...]

Out of curiosity, do you have a reason for wanting to keep the
"old-fashioned way"? Is it a goal of your project to depend on s6 and
s6-rc, but not current s6-linux-init? It seems to me that doing so
would be easier. It even looks like you could use the current
/etc/slew/init/rc.{init,fin} scripts (perhaps with minor adjustments)
as s6-linux-init's rc.init and rc.shutdown for slew, respectively.

G.