From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/416
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Charlie Brady <charlieb-supervision@e-smith.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general
Subject: Re: runit/dependencies
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 14:44:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405111444250.11507-100000@allspice.nssg.mitel.com>
References: <c7r5ua$q0g$1@sea.gmane.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084301096 29479 80.91.224.253 (11 May 2004 18:44:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:44:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Original-X-From: supervision-return-654-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Tue May 11 20:44:46 2004
Return-path: <supervision-return-654-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org>
Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14])
	by deer.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BNcFC-0007NO-00
	for <gcsg-supervision@gmane.org>; Tue, 11 May 2004 20:44:46 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 5386 invoked by uid 76); 11 May 2004 18:45:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.skarnet.org/lists/>
Original-Received: (qmail 5380 invoked from network); 11 May 2004 18:45:07 -0000
X-X-Sender: charlieb@allspice.nssg.mitel.com
Original-To: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@backtobasicsmgmt.com>
In-Reply-To: <c7r5ua$q0g$1@sea.gmane.org>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:416
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:416


On Tue, 11 May 2004, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

> Charlie Brady wrote:
> 
> > I still don't see the need for anything more than a few "svc -u ..." calls 
> > in the run script, followed by one or more "probe and exit if service not 
> > available" calls.
> 
> It appears that your comments are in reference to daemontools, when I 
> assumed they were in reference to runit. Does that change anything?

No.

--
Charlie