From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1652 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Charlie Brady Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: RE: runit not collecting zombies Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:27:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <46561ABE.7030008@podgorny.cz> <50F2BE60A0EF6D478B1BCC633DEC28CC082BEE@server.home.internal> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203956896 21744 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2008 16:28:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alex Efros , supervision@list.skarnet.org To: rehan khan Original-X-From: supervision-return-1887-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Mon Feb 25 17:28:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JTgBk-0004QS-3K for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:28:24 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 28947 invoked by uid 76); 25 Feb 2008 16:28:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 28938 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2008 16:28:14 -0000 X-X-Sender: charlieb@e-smith.charlieb.ott.istop.com In-Reply-To: <50F2BE60A0EF6D478B1BCC633DEC28CC082BEE@server.home.internal> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1652 Archived-At: On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, rehan khan wrote: > Actually a number of the updated packages *could* be the cause of this > issue. The package that I would look at closest is the bash upgrade as > runit scripts depend on the built-in exec command properly replacing the > shell with the same process id. That's a function of the exec* system calls, and doesn't need anything special in bash. > I don't think the kernel is implicated if you haven't restarted the > machine. I think it would be imprudent to make that assumption.