From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/2307
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Charlie Brady <charlieb-supervision@budge.apana.org.au>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general
Subject: Re: Incompatibilities between runit and s6?
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:19:45 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1801110914490.16098@e-smith.charliebrady.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1801101012520.13159@e-smith.charliebrady.org>
 <em54b6616e-4b46-40c5-8776-53f3cade30a1@elzian>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1515680270 12358 195.159.176.226 (11 Jan 2018 14:17:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:17:50 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: supervision@list.skarnet.org
To: Laurent Bercot <ska-supervision@skarnet.org>
Original-X-From: supervision-return-1898-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Thu Jan 11 15:17:46 2018
Return-path: <supervision-return-1898-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org>
Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from alyss.skarnet.org ([95.142.172.232])
	by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <supervision-return-1898-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org>)
	id 1eZdfr-0002pY-OB
	for gcsg-supervision@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:17:43 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 14472 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jan 2018 14:20:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
Original-Sender: <supervision@list.skarnet.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 14465 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2018 14:20:13 -0000
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2GwZADPcVda/wzcpUVeHAEBAQQBAQoBA?=
 =?us-ascii?q?YNBgVqOXnKNagGBWlkBkgWEeYIVHYUoAoQ8Sw0BAQEBAQEBAQEDaCiFJQY6HCM?=
 =?us-ascii?q?QCw44OR4GikaxeYo5AQsmhCuDLTSCKYJ5ix4FkzyQKJdfiXo3h0WKZ4wtgUxND?=
 =?us-ascii?q?IFQMhofgwGCUxyCBSOMdgEBAQ?=
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2GwZADPcVda/wzcpUVeHAEBAQQBAQoBAYNBgVqOXnKNagG?=
 =?us-ascii?q?BWlkBkgWEeYIVHYUoAoQ8Sw0BAQEBAQEBAQEDaCiFJQY6HCMQCw44OR4Gikaxe?=
 =?us-ascii?q?Yo5AQsmhCuDLTSCKYJ5ix4FkzyQKJdfiXo3h0WKZ4wtgUxNDIFQMhofgwGCUxy?=
 =?us-ascii?q?CBSOMdgEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,344,1511845200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="17275331"
X-X-Sender: charlieb@e-smith.charliebrady.org
In-Reply-To: <em54b6616e-4b46-40c5-8776-53f3cade30a1@elzian>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:2307
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/2307>


On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, Laurent Bercot wrote:

> >If you are a systemd user, chances are you do not need s6.
> >
> >Really? So all the criticism of systemd is bunkum?
> 
>  :) I need to update this page.
>  What this means is that systemd does provide a supervision
> infrastructure, so for people stuck with systemd, it's okay to use what
> their system provides, and s6 is redundant there. This does not mean
> that all my systemd criticism is invalid.
> 
>  Also, admittedly, I simply did not want to read the systemd unit file
> documentation to understand how to start a s6 supervision tree from
> systemd. I will do the effort and come up with a small unit file
> suitable for this.

Thanks. I would rather you write one small unit file then me needing to 
write ten or fifteen of them.

I agree with you about the systemd unit file documentation. That's exactly 
why I still need runit or s6. Well, one of the reasons.