From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 20359 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2022 09:23:20 -0000 Received: from alyss.skarnet.org (95.142.172.232) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 29 Sep 2022 09:23:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 27369 invoked by uid 89); 29 Sep 2022 09:23:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 27362 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2022 09:23:45 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=umbrellix.net; s=umbrellix.net; t=1664443395; bh=FGk2JTyXMlDvBlUX3rFpC/zzCDX43wrVMmrQMyoDw3k=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=N1zv2GAATk5AIPdtBtArLb8tIYr58RP/WkyxeiHNrIdMsWTTA8uDNf5keov7mJk0y FfbBjvReSl/Q2l+XuX5dKoLbA3QVXXhwBm89ABUCBjW9wfgJLbjyPxxbBmNryLafPK LPkZ2nSNr7txDiL/Bg+Fl2aJrE1zpPqY76Hr2+OY= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:23:14 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 Subject: Re: gpg-agent runit run script Content-Language: en-US To: supervision@list.skarnet.org, phlogiston@sapo.pt, hi@alyssa.is References: <87leq683uf.fsf@alyssa.is> From: Ellenor Bjornsdottir Organization: Umbrellix In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I'd have to assume that it would be achievable by patching the support back in, but at that point you are effectively maintaining your own fork of GPG-Agent. On 9/29/22 09:20, João wrote: > Hello Alyssa, > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 05:04:08PM +0000, Alyssa Ross wrote: >> Not an answer to your question, but you might be interested to know >> before you spend too much time on it that GnuPG is removing support for >> running gpg-agent supervised: >> >> https://dev.gnupg.org/rGca5d5142c6d6eaba4572a086f8473e4aebdd3f9e > Thank you for the heads up. This seems like a deliberate regression, and it is a > pity. > Would this make it impossible to supervise gpg-agent, or would there be a way > around it? > > Best regards, > João -- Ellenor Agnes Bjornsdottir (she) sysadmin umbrellix.net jabber: ellenor ~on~ umbrellix.net