From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/2781 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Laurent Bercot" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: s6 usability Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:14:12 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20191125214342.y7lx5mixrljr6s27@gromit.local> <20191127203307.ohaameqfgncm52h5@gromit.local> <20191129140901.klifpegc74iv4zul@klumpi.ignorelist.com> <20191221092639.p5iid3y3csmni4iw@klumpi.ignorelist.com> <20191222153327.6ee088bd@mydesk.domain.cxm> <20191223022821.6c13cff6@dickeberta> Reply-To: "Laurent Bercot" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------=_MBC452B546-332C-463B-B807-B383679C4515" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="116869"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: eM_Client/7.2.36908.0 To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-2370-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Mon Dec 23 10:14:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from alyss.skarnet.org ([95.142.172.232]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ijJn3-000UJm-HR for gcsg-supervision@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:14:13 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 17637 invoked by uid 89); 23 Dec 2019 09:14:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm Original-Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Original-Received: (qmail 17630 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2019 09:14:38 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20191223022821.6c13cff6@dickeberta> X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvddvtddgtdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecupfgfoffgtffkveetuefngfdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfrhgfgggtsegrtderredtreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfnfgruhhrvghnthcuuegvrhgtohhtfdcuoehskhgrqdhsuhhpvghrvhhishhiohhnsehskhgrrhhnvghtrdhorhhgqeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:2781 Archived-At: --------=_MBC452B546-332C-463B-B807-B383679C4515 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >However - what is the concrete suggestion from the Debian guys what >Laurent should do? The Debian people are happy with putting execline binaries in a=20 separate directory that is not in the default PATH. They don't see a problem with that. And the thing is, nobody will notice a problem either - except people who try calling useful execline binaries (such as redirfd)=20 outside of execline scripts, *which is a use case I officially want to support*. I'll try releasing the execline version with a POSIX-compliant umask before the end of the year. Then we'll see where Debian really stands. -- Laurent --------=_MBC452B546-332C-463B-B807-B383679C4515--