From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/2407 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Laurent Bercot" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: More Answers Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 11:51:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: "Laurent Bercot" NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1545646119 10671 195.159.176.226 (24 Dec 2018 10:08:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:08:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: eM_Client/7.2.33939.0 To: Supervision Original-X-From: supervision-return-1997-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Mon Dec 24 11:08:35 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from alyss.skarnet.org ([95.142.172.232]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gbNA2-0002h6-MZ for gcsg-supervision@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 11:08:34 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 1174 invoked by uid 89); 24 Dec 2018 10:11:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm Original-Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 1123 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2018 10:11:08 -0000 In-Reply-To: X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtkedrudekuddgudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecupfgfoffgtffkveetuefngfdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfrhgfgggtgfesthhqredttderjeenucfhrhhomhepfdfnrghurhgvnhhtuceuvghrtghothdfuceoshhkrgdqshhuphgvrhhvihhsihhonhesshhkrghrnhgvthdrohhrgheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehsthgrtghkvgigtghhrghnghgvrdgtohhmnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:2407 Archived-At: >* https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/489949/5132 > >This may be of interest to people looking for some (brief) comparative ana= lysis. Including the further reading. (-: Thanks for the heads-up! I posted an answer in complement to yours. We really need to settle on some terminology. I don't like your use of "service manager" to mean "supervision system", and your use of "system manager" to mean what I call a "service manager" is meh. I'd be okay to ban the "service manager" terminology entirely because it's confusing, and use "supervision system" and "state manager" (which sounds better than "system manager" to me) instead. Thoughts? -- Laurent