From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 23594 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2021 13:39:54 -0000
Received: from alyss.skarnet.org (95.142.172.232)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 17 Feb 2021 13:39:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 482 invoked by uid 89); 17 Feb 2021 13:40:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
Sender: <supervision@list.skarnet.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Id: <supervision.list.skarnet.org>
Received: (qmail 473 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2021 13:40:16 -0000
From: "Laurent Bercot" <ska-supervision@skarnet.org>
To: "supervision@list.skarnet.org" <supervision@list.skarnet.org>
Subject: Re: Path monitoring support in s6-services
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:39:51 +0000
Message-Id: <em8e73c5d3-abef-483b-9321-3a8e673e9ce2@elzian>
In-Reply-To: <CAH9hU4J9a320hGD1TZyg+n_8he-GPV+H8oO7i3ARUnEcibSCYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH9hU4LR7Jp=vi5E4jVYvJFDzGmJKRm6ak+1H9UZLP=mNwTNQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YCzhY08cK0QqP/7v@caspervector>
 <CAH9hU4Lc+yRfN-4VrO4=HeYHbHeUozf-bWCtR3P-fZvUkVwCFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <emf1bfa12b-d795-4500-852f-fd5a5bbde154@elzian>
 <CAH9hU4J9a320hGD1TZyg+n_8he-GPV+H8oO7i3ARUnEcibSCYA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Laurent Bercot" <ska-supervision@skarnet.org>
User-Agent: eM_Client/8.1.1054.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrjedvgddvkecutefuodetggdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecupfgfoffgtffkveetuefngfdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfrhgfgggtgfesthhqredttderjeenucfhrhhomhepfdfnrghurhgvnhhtuceuvghrtghothdfuceoshhkrgdqshhuphgvrhhvihhsihhonhesshhkrghrnhgvthdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdfgveffueelgedvkedtffetgedvieeifeektefgueehffehleehjefhveeuieejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth

>Since it requires individual instances of inotifyd for each service(s)
>[which depends on  multiple files/paths modifications) to get started]

  Have you tried it and noticed an impact on your boot times?
(AKA: "Profile, don't speculate.")

--
  Laurent