From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/2650 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Laurent Bercot" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: s6-linux-init: Actions after unmounting filesystems Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 06:26:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20190818040925.yqy4nm7cwsnrtyjl@caspervector> Reply-To: "Laurent Bercot" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="168555"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: eM_Client/7.2.34711.0 To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-2240-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Sun Aug 18 08:26:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from alyss.skarnet.org ([95.142.172.232]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hzEdv-000hdO-3X for gcsg-supervision@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 08:26:19 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 28400 invoked by uid 89); 18 Aug 2019 06:26:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm Original-Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Original-Received: (qmail 28393 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2019 06:26:43 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20190818040925.yqy4nm7cwsnrtyjl@caspervector> X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudefiedguddtjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfpfgfogfftkfevteeunffgpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhhrfgggtgfgsehtqhertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfnfgruhhrvghnthcuuegvrhgtohhtfdcuoehskhgrqdhsuhhpvghrvhhishhiohhnsehskhgrrhhnvghtrdhorhhgqeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:2650 Archived-At: >Sorry if I read this thread too hastily, but why not just keep /proc etc >mounted, as was seemingly the way with s6-linux-init <=3Dv0.4.x.x (and >therefore slew)? Since the asymmetry is by nature, simply respecting it >appears to be one minimalist way. The umount command basically performs a "umount -a". I can add a list of filesystems that should be kept, but it's more ad-hoc code. It's ugly. But I guess the whole situation is ad-hoc anyway, so elegance isn't exactly what we're going for here :/ -- Laurent