From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 12373 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2021 12:06:41 -0000 Received: from alyss.skarnet.org (95.142.172.232) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 17 Feb 2021 12:06:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 30928 invoked by uid 89); 17 Feb 2021 12:07:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm Sender: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Received: (qmail 30921 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2021 12:07:06 -0000 From: "Laurent Bercot" To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Subject: Re: Path monitoring support in s6-services Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:06:40 +0000 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: "Laurent Bercot" User-Agent: eM_Client/8.1.1054.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrjedvgddtlecutefuodetggdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecupfgfoffgtffkveetuefngfdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfrhgfgggtgfesthhqredttderjeenucfhrhhomhepfdfnrghurhgvnhhtuceuvghrtghothdfuceoshhkrgdqshhuphgvrhhvihhsihhonhesshhkrghrnhgvthdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdfgveffueelgedvkedtffetgedvieeifeektefgueehffehleehjefhveeuieejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth >> inotifyd (or something similar) + s6-svc (or s6-rc)? >Thought of the same but I have many such services;Just thinking of cpu >overhead during the initial boot up. What makes you think this would have a noticeable impact on your CPU load? -- Laurent