From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1705 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robin Bowes Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: Help with chpst -e Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:31:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20080414083428.GK20279@utopia.intra.guy> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208183656 13746 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2008 14:34:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:34:16 +0000 (UTC) To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-1940-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Mon Apr 14 16:34:51 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlPiw-000369-O0 for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:31:58 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 22833 invoked by uid 76); 14 Apr 2008 14:31:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 22827 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2008 14:31:40 -0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 31 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 84-51-160-74.pambow882.adsl.metronet.co.uk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Original-Sender: news Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1705 Archived-At: Charlie Brady wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Robin Bowes wrote: > >>> There is also another way, if you don't like the sh -c part: >>> >>> #!/bin/sh >>> if [ "$1" = "have-env" ]; then >>> exec chpst -u "$LOGUSER" svlogd -tt "$LOGDIR" \ >>> else >>> exec chpst -e ./env "$0" have-env >>> fi >> >> Isn't that effectively doing the same thing, but without implicitly >> invoking "sh -c" ? > > s/implicitly/explicitly/ > > Yes, that was my thought too. You run /bin/sh twice either way. And, it would perhaps be less cluttered to do: #!/bin/sh if [ "$1" != "have-env" ]; then exec chpst -e ./env "$0" have-env fi exec chpst -u "$LOGUSER" svlogd -tt "$LOGDIR" R.