From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1870 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robin Bowes Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general Subject: Re: runit-1.9.0 available Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:55:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <48296B7C.20302@robinbowes.com> <20080514231129.GH12997@run.duo> <1E2C4BEA-6AD6-4E52-9A53-FA71F604ED8C@cynicbytrade.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1210942485 3956 80.91.229.12 (16 May 2008 12:54:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 12:54:45 +0000 (UTC) To: supervision@list.skarnet.org Original-X-From: supervision-return-2105-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Fri May 16 14:55:22 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JwzSs-0008Nh-C3 for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 14:55:14 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 22996 invoked by uid 76); 16 May 2008 12:54:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Original-Received: (qmail 22988 invoked from network); 16 May 2008 12:54:48 -0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 84-51-160-74.pambow882.adsl.metronet.co.uk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) In-Reply-To: <1E2C4BEA-6AD6-4E52-9A53-FA71F604ED8C@cynicbytrade.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Original-Sender: news Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1870 Archived-At: Zachary Kotlarek wrote: >> I've built netbooting/embedded systems where /etc was mounted >> read-only. Putting the run, check, supervise and finish scripts there >> makes sense -- but it would be nice if the supervise directories could >> be split out and stored elsewhere (presumably on tmpfs) in such >> environments. > > I do that exactly -- /, including /etc, is read-only on most of my > systems. I put scripts in /etc/supervise so they hit the configuration > management, and symlink the supervise directory to /var/tmp/run/whatever > so it can be read/write. That makes sense to me. What would make more sense is being able to specify that the supervise directory should be created in some location other than the service directory, e.g. /var/run/service_name. R.