From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/493
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general
Subject: Re: Who actually gets the TERM signal in "runsvctrl down"?
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 00:03:24 -0400
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <m3pt7n9d9v.fsf@asfast.com>
References: <m3brj7f67z.fsf@asfast.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0406252150440.2967-100000@e-smith.charlieb.ott.istop.com>
 <m3d63ndon7.fsf@asfast.com> <m3k6xvaupy.fsf@asfast.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1088222689 13443 80.91.224.253 (26 Jun 2004 04:04:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:04:49 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: supervision-return-731-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Sat Jun 26 06:04:40 2004
Return-path: <supervision-return-731-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org>
Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14])
	by deer.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Be4Qi-0005ke-00
	for <gcsg-supervision@gmane.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 06:04:40 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 18571 invoked by uid 76); 26 Jun 2004 04:05:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.skarnet.org/lists/>
Original-Received: (qmail 18565 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2004 04:05:01 -0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Original-Lines: 19
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hippo.asfast.com
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ldBi8jAGGlJ/ytUl1njXcEk7L8A=
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:493
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:493

Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com> writes:

> [ ... ]
>
>   restart:   runscvtrl t apache; runsvctrl u apache
>   (causes cleanup stuff to run during the second command)

We both suggested this one, but I have a question:

Why do we need the second "u" command?  Won't the "run" script restart
on its own after the "t" command, thereby obviating the need for the "u"
command?  In this case, the cleanup stuff in the script will get
re-invoked on restart, correct?


-- 
 Lloyd Zusman
 ljz@asfast.com
 God bless you.