From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1354
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc)
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general
Subject: Re: Problem with debian runit package / libowfat
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:15 -0500
Organization: What did you have in mind?  A short, blunt, human pyramid?
Message-ID: <m3y7pj7ddd.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
References: <20061122040858.GF12058@mikebell.org>
	<20061205105203.30922.qmail@ca2d9b8e62a85c.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>
	<20061207184330.GA2716@mikebell.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165517179 2913 80.91.229.10 (7 Dec 2006 18:46:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 18:46:19 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: supervision-return-1590-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org Thu Dec 07 19:46:18 2006
Return-path: <supervision-return-1590-gcsg-supervision=m.gmane.org@list.skarnet.org>
Envelope-to: gcsg-supervision@gmane.org
Original-Received: from antah.skarnet.org ([212.85.147.14])
	by dough.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1GsOGA-00086p-0O
	for gcsg-supervision@gmane.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:46:18 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 8971 invoked by uid 76); 7 Dec 2006 18:46:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact supervision-help@list.skarnet.org; run by ezmlm
List-Post: <mailto:supervision@list.skarnet.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supervision-help@list.skarnet.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:supervision-unsubscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:supervision-subscribe@list.skarnet.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.skarnet.org/lists/>
Original-Received: (qmail 8964 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2006 18:46:39 -0000
Original-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org
In-Reply-To: <20061207184330.GA2716@mikebell.org> (Mike Bell's message of
	"Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:43:30 -0800")
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Mail-Followup-To: supervision@list.skarnet.org
Original-Lines: 12
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general:1354
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.supervision.general/1354>

Mike Bell <mike@mikebell.org> wrote:
> Fixing it would involve expanding struct stat by two bytes for every
> user, which is why I didn't report it on the dietlibc list, I'm not
> sure it belongs in _diet_libc.

The "diet" refers to the goal of small *code* size, not data.  I
wouldn't expect any objections on those grounds, and even the
transition should be relatively painless, since dietlibc is usually
linked statically.


paul