The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ron@ronnatalie.com (Ron Natalie)
Subject: [TUHS] Claim your early Unix contributions on GitHub
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:54:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000301d18b97$eefa5200$cceef600$@ronnatalie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC20D2MWhZczOAd-pCTTOspTejyvTYEwRm+Sd_XTd_62aTuBpg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1267 bytes --]

Thanks for that piece of history.   I remember well the days of using icheck and dcheck (coupled with some of the other tools like ncheck and clri…which we rewrote to clrm…much safer because it was easier to reverse if you got the wrong one.     One thing afflicting the V6 file system was that it wasn't too safe in the way it committed changes.   Hence, you could get "dups in free" and  inode link counts that differed from the number of entries in directories.    I remember being grilled on this my freshman year on the file system format, what the various failures were, how to detect them with icheck/dcheck and how to fix them before they'd let me play computer operator on the UNIX system.

FSCK was a big improvement but so was fixing up the ordering in the file system so as not to get degenerate cases (better to lose blocks from the free list than to have them duplicated).

My favorite FSCK story was I was called by an operator one time to tell me that "FSCK had gone into a loop."    When I got there, I found the machine running FSCK on the root, deciding it needed to reboot the machine and doing so and then rerunning FSCK getting the same error.     Somehow the operator neglected to mention that part of the loop was the machine rebooting.



  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-31 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-30  7:53 Diomidis Spinellis
2016-03-30 12:31 ` Joerg Schilling
2016-03-30 13:10   ` Diomidis Spinellis
2016-03-30 13:44     ` Joerg Schilling
2016-03-30 19:17   ` Larry McVoy
2016-03-30 21:07     ` Random832
2016-03-30 23:03       ` Joerg Schilling
2016-03-31  3:20       ` Larry McVoy
2016-03-31  3:34         ` Random832
2016-03-31  3:40           ` Larry McVoy
2016-03-30 23:42     ` Joerg Schilling
2016-03-31  3:54       ` Larry McVoy
2016-03-30 14:25 ` Marc Rochkind
2016-03-30 15:23   ` Joerg Schilling
2016-03-30 19:14     ` Larry McVoy
2016-03-30 15:49   ` Diomidis Spinellis
2016-03-30 16:07     ` Joerg Schilling
2016-03-30 16:29       ` Diomidis Spinellis
2016-03-30 16:14     ` Pat Barron
2016-03-31 21:06       ` Clem Cole
2016-03-31 21:54         ` Ron Natalie [this message]
2016-04-01  9:01         ` Diomidis Spinellis
2016-04-01 14:41           ` Clem Cole
2016-04-01 21:00           ` Jeremy C. Reed
2016-04-01 13:06         ` Dave Horsfall
2016-04-01 21:52         ` Pat Barron
2016-03-30 16:30     ` Marc Rochkind
2016-03-30 16:40       ` Joerg Schilling
2016-03-30 16:55       ` John Cowan
2016-03-30 18:28 Norman Wilson
2016-03-30 20:06 ` Ronald Natalie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000301d18b97$eefa5200$cceef600$@ronnatalie.com' \
    --to=ron@ronnatalie.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).