From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: iking@killthewabbit.org (Ian King) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:24:22 -0800 Subject: [pups] Progress on 2.11BSD kernel References: <200303191736.h2JHaw302449@moe.2bsd.com> Message-ID: <001201c2ee44$c3c15790$450010ac@dawabbit> My MAXUSERS is most modest (the default 4) as is my number of ttys. I followed your advice on this, as the overall size of unix.o wasn't excessive but I still got the 'type 431' error; after shuffling some pieces out, unix.o linked and the build continued. Maybe it's FM.... -- Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven M. Schultz" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 9:36 AM Subject: Re: [pups] Progress on 2.11BSD kernel > Hi - > > > From: "Ian King" > > Well, given the excellent advice I received here (especially from Steven > > Schultz), I got the networking kernel to build after moving a few modules > > around between overlays. It was indeed the overage on DATA/BSS that was > > Hmmm, if it was an overage on the DATA/BSS (which is hard to do unless > you overdeclare MAXUSERS or the number of tty devices) then > shuffling overlays wouldn't have made any difference since overlays > affect only code and not data allocation. > [snip]