From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ron@ronnatalie.com (Ron Natalie)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:23:34 -0500
Subject: [TUHS] nm on Third Edition .o files?'
In-Reply-To: <CAC20D2NwBn59HS6ne13OtcM9XPf6sM148+MSN8Kvca1F=_Dcwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20161220130553.15FDC18C098@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
 <CAC20D2PY3iH0ftkRsSeT4He_ks+sApEbftRbAZZu-yHWn_1M_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <006701d25ada$b64262a0$22c727e0$@ronnatalie.com>
 <20161220160941.GS11813@mcvoy.com>
 <CAC20D2NwBn59HS6ne13OtcM9XPf6sM148+MSN8Kvca1F=_Dcwg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <007e01d25add$6a18ad00$3e4a0700$@ronnatalie.com>

And nothing precludes you from tagging the structure elements.    We continued to do that long after the compiler was “fixed.”



 

From: Clem Cole [mailto:clemc@ccc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 11:22 AM
To: Larry McVoy
Cc: Ron Natalie; Noel Chiappa; TUHS main list
Subject: Re: [TUHS] nm on Third Edition .o files?'

 

 

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Larry McVoy <lm at mcvoy.com> wrote:

I get that it doesn't scale but man, so nice when reading
code to know that s.st_size is a stat structure.

 

​Amen!!!​

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20161220/21db0f19/attachment-0001.html>