From: michael_davidson@pacbell.net (Michael Davidson)
Subject: [TUHS] SCO sues IBM?
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 20:11:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <008701c2e784$46186b60$e847030a@ca.caldera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030310211518.GL90290@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>
To: Jeffrey Sharp <jss at subatomix.com>
Cc: UNIX Heritage Society <tuhs at tuhs.org>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: [TUHS] SCO sues IBM?
> On 2003-Mar-10 14:21:00 -0600, Jeffrey Sharp <jss at subatomix.com> wrote:
> >On Sunday, March 9, 2003, Michael Davidson wrote:
> >> I will, however, ask for an "official" statement of SCO's current
position
> >> on "Ancient UNIX"
> >
> >But once they've released it under a BSD-style license, it is released.
They
> >simply can't unrelease it. They don't have to continue distributing it,
but
> >they can't stop me from doing what the license explicitly allows. So
their
> >current position WRT ancient UNIX may not mave much legal weight. IANAL,
> >TINLA.
>
> AFAIK, the only evidence we have that it is released under a BSD-style
> license is an e-mail allegedly from an authorised person within SCO.
> Warren has not been able to find an equivalent statement on their
> website. I suspect Warren is concerned that they could claim it was
> never released - ie the e-mail is a faked/forged or the sender didn't
> have the authority to make the claims therein.
>
I can assure you that the email from Dion Johnson was and is genuine.
The release of "Ancient UNIX" under a BSD license was agreed to by
Ransom Love (then president and CEO of Caldera), Drew Spencer
(then CTO of Caldera), Dion, myself and others.
I realise that some people are concerned that they can no longer find
the "Ancient UNIX" license on the SCO web site - I wouldn't read too
much into that - the "Ancient UNIX" stuff was always tucked away in
an obscure corner - I suspect that the link to it just got lost when we
stopped doing free evaluation licenses for the current product.
Anyway, as I said, I will try to get an "official statement" about the
"Ancient UNIX" license by the end of the week - I expect that statement
will simply re-affirm what you already know - ie that it has been released
under a BSD license, and possibly re-emphasize the fact that System III,
and System V are *NOT* covered by that license.
(However, I am *not* in a position where I can make such a statement
on behalf on SCO which is why I'm afraid you will have to wait a few
days so that I can get you the "official" position).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-11 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-10 1:21 Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2003-03-10 2:33 ` David C. Jenner
2003-03-10 3:28 ` Peter Jeremy
2003-03-10 20:23 ` Jeffrey Sharp
2003-03-10 3:13 ` Michael Davidson
2003-03-10 20:21 ` Jeffrey Sharp
2003-03-10 21:15 ` Peter Jeremy
2003-03-10 21:54 ` David C. Jenner
2003-03-10 23:45 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2003-03-11 0:22 ` Peter Jeremy
2003-03-11 1:14 ` Gregg C Levine
2003-03-11 1:51 ` Warren Toomey
2003-03-11 1:59 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2003-03-11 3:51 ` Warren Toomey
2003-03-11 4:11 ` Michael Davidson [this message]
2003-03-11 9:44 ` Sven Mascheck
2003-03-11 15:40 ` Gregg C Levine
2003-03-12 4:05 ` Jeffrey Sharp
2003-03-12 4:46 ` Jeffrey Sharp
2003-03-12 5:03 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2003-03-12 20:31 ` Peter Jeremy
2003-03-12 20:33 ` Wm. G. McGrath
2003-03-11 3:51 ` Wm. G. McGrath
2003-03-10 21:52 Wesley Parish
2003-03-11 5:25 Dennis Ritchie
2003-03-11 6:01 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2003-03-12 4:34 ` Jeffrey Sharp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='008701c2e784$46186b60$e847030a@ca.caldera.com' \
--to=michael_davidson@pacbell.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).