From: ron@ronnatalie.com (Ron Natalie)
Subject: [TUHS] C declarations.
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 19:06:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <030d01d2cd06$c44e2840$4cea78c0$@ronnatalie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6D3DCC45-B2C6-4374-83EE-F745C0AF7F36@bitblocks.com>
You all are missing the point as to what the cost of passing arrays by value
or what other languages do.
C is implicitly a pass/return by value language for EVERY SINGLE POSSIBLE
DATATYPE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ARRAYS.
Arrays are special for no reason other than it was thought to costly to do
it any otherway. In fact, had it not been kludged up into a
pseudo-pass-by-reference,
nobody would have probably been the wiser. It was too hard to pass/return
structs by value either in the initial compilers, but they fixed it to work
exactly that way.
So we have this array kludge that works differently than everything else.
Further, due to the kludgosity, it's not even exactly type safe.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20170514/d7e5bfc5/attachment.html>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-14 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 21:49 Ron Natalie
2017-05-11 22:01 ` Arthur Krewat
2017-05-11 23:44 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-11 22:03 ` David Arnold
2017-05-11 22:32 ` Larry McVoy
2017-05-11 22:41 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-13 1:24 ` Larry McVoy
2017-05-13 2:45 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-13 12:20 ` Michael Kjörling
2017-05-13 12:35 ` Tim Bradshaw
2017-05-13 12:42 ` Michael Kjörling
2017-05-13 15:36 ` Stephen Kitt
2017-05-14 1:59 ` Lawrence Stewart
2017-05-14 2:23 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-14 4:24 ` Bakul Shah
2017-05-14 6:12 ` Steve Johnson
2017-05-14 6:48 ` Bakul Shah
2017-05-14 23:06 ` Ron Natalie [this message]
2017-05-14 23:34 ` Arthur Krewat
2017-05-15 0:14 ` Dan Cross
2017-05-15 0:23 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-15 3:43 ` Random832
2017-05-15 0:40 ` Larry McVoy
2017-05-15 2:00 ` Nevin Liber
2017-05-15 10:21 ` Tony Finch
2017-05-15 4:35 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-15 4:54 ` Bakul Shah
2017-05-15 5:01 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-15 12:58 ` Michael Kjörling
2017-05-15 16:58 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-15 19:00 ` [TUHS] cdecl (Re: " Bakul Shah
2017-05-15 22:52 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-13 13:46 ` [TUHS] " Hellwig Geisse
2017-05-13 19:08 ` Random832
2017-05-13 23:21 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-14 14:48 ` Nemo
2017-05-13 19:05 ` Random832
2017-05-14 13:14 ` Derek Fawcus
2017-05-12 0:15 ` Bakul Shah
2017-05-12 2:41 ` Theo Pavlidis
2017-05-12 14:04 Richard Tobin
2017-05-13 23:11 Richard Tobin
2017-05-15 6:46 ` Tim Bradshaw
2017-05-14 14:11 Doug McIlroy
2017-05-14 14:58 ` Steve Nickolas
2017-05-15 18:47 Steve Johnson
2017-05-15 19:54 ` Bakul Shah
2017-05-16 7:25 ` George Ross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='030d01d2cd06$c44e2840$4cea78c0$@ronnatalie.com' \
--to=ron@ronnatalie.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).