The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Stewart <stewart@serissa.com>
To: Ralph Corderoy <ralph@inputplus.co.uk>
Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org
Subject: [TUHS] Re: who invented the link register
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 07:12:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <03E1CE6B-6112-4EAB-BFE1-E5AFC0A2075B@serissa.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221026044530.1DAC22033C@orac.inputplus.co.uk>

Whirlwind I had a TD (transfer digits) instruction that stored only the low 11 bits from the accumulator to storage

> On Oct 26, 2022, at 12:45 AM, Ralph Corderoy <ralph@inputplus.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi Lawrence,
> 
>> With the new SP and TA, one would use SP to call a subroutine, and the
>> first instruction of any subroutine would be TA to save the return
>> address into the final location of the subroutine.  (TA only modified
>> the low 11 bits of the 16 bit location)
>> 
>> Before these instructions, a subroutine call would require one
>> additional memory location, to hold the return address for each point
>> of call, and one additional instruction, one to load the return
>> address into the accumulator and one to store it into the code at the
>> end of the subroutine.  (The latter could be the first instruction of
>> the subroutine.)
> 
> So before SP and TA, would the ‘latter’ instruction at the start of the
> subroutine, which stores the accumulator holding the return address, be
> modifying all sixteen bits of the location unlike TA which only modifies
> the bottom eleven?
> 
> If so, did the accumulator's top bits hold the ‘return’ op-code or was
> there another instruction near the subroutine's end which loaded the
> 11-bit address before a second instruction jumped to it?
> 
> -- 
> Cheers, Ralph.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-26 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-12 19:01 [TUHS] " ron minnich
2022-10-24 23:46 ` [TUHS] " Angelo Papenhoff
2022-10-25  8:35   ` Angelo Papenhoff
2022-10-25 17:00     ` Lawrence Stewart
2022-10-25 18:26       ` Clem Cole
2022-10-25 20:05         ` Marc Donner
2022-10-25 21:03           ` Lawrence Stewart
2022-10-26  4:45       ` Ralph Corderoy
2022-10-26  5:29         ` Angelo Papenhoff
2022-10-26  7:52           ` Marc Donner
2022-10-26 11:12         ` Larry Stewart [this message]
2022-10-25 22:24 ` Bakul Shah
2022-10-25 22:41   ` Harald Arnesen
2022-10-25 22:47   ` Robert Clausecker
2022-10-25 22:52 Noel Chiappa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=03E1CE6B-6112-4EAB-BFE1-E5AFC0A2075B@serissa.com \
    --to=stewart@serissa.com \
    --cc=ralph@inputplus.co.uk \
    --cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).