From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: brantley@coraid.com (Brantley Coile) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 06:52:34 -0500 Subject: [TUHS] Caldera ancient UNIX license question In-Reply-To: <201208130828.q7D8S0Va011757@freefriends.org> References: <1344826817.1674.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org> <20120813040200.GE5969@bitmover.com> <201208130828.q7D8S0Va011757@freefriends.org> Message-ID: <0C96DD13-9C9C-4668-A488-023FC0C26689@coraid.com> maybe Norman could speak to the attitudes about source code control and the perceived need for it. sent from my ipad On Aug 13, 2012, at 2:32 AM, "arnold at skeeve.com" wrote: > Larry McVoy wrote: > >>> I'm >>> sure there are other (mainly smaller) examples, though since we >>> used no source-code control mechanism, tracing the details is >>> non-trivial. >> >> No SCCS? When did Rochkind do SCCS? Wasn't it early 70's? I gotta believe >> there is SCCS history out there. And for the record, BitKeeper can read it. > > I think Norman's point was that the Research guys didn't use a source > code control system. SCCS was around and documented in System III in 1980, > so it was probably done before then, but not in the research group. > > Arnold > _______________________________________________ > TUHS mailing list > TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org > https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs