The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Charles H. Sauer" <sauer@technologists.com>
To: Ed Bradford <egbegb2@gmail.com>
Cc: TUHS main list <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] PC Unix (had been How to Kill a Technical Conference
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 21:44:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10F81A21-AC7A-4644-A988-8E35F9216FEB@technologists.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHTagfG9wVL97Oc5KmJXw-Ka9ciJV3RRUXDrTbBsgcRFC1VXfQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2343 bytes --]

Not sure when started, probably 1986, continued through my departure in May 1989, and apparently the machine continued after that.

> On Apr 6, 2021, at 9:30 PM, Ed Bradford <egbegb2@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> What year was this, Charles?
> 
> Ed
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:33 PM Charles H Sauer <sauer@technologists.com <mailto:sauer@technologists.com>> wrote:
> For much of my last few years at IBM, my uucp machine, ibmchs, was an AT 
> running Xenix, probably that version of Xenix.
> 
> On 4/6/2021 12:09 PM, Clem Cole wrote:
> > Doug -- IIRC IBM private-labeled a Microsoft put out a version of Xenix, 
> > although I think it required an PC/AT (286)
> > ᐧ
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 11:36 AM M Douglas McIlroy 
> > <m.douglas.mcilroy@dartmouth.edu <mailto:m.douglas.mcilroy@dartmouth.edu> 
> > <mailto:m.douglas.mcilroy@dartmouth.edu <mailto:m.douglas.mcilroy@dartmouth.edu>>> wrote:
> > 
> >      > I wonder. IBM introduced the IBM PC in August of 1981.
> >      > That was years after a non-memory managed version of
> >      > Unix was created by Heinze Lycklama,  LSX. Is anyone
> >      > on this list familiar with Bell Labs management thoughts
> >      > on  selling IBM on LSX rather than "dos"?
> > 
> >     IBM famously failed to buy the well-established CP/M in
> >     1980. (CP/M had been introduced in 1974, before the
> >     advent of the LSI-11 on which LSX ran.) By then IBM had
> >     settled on Basic and Intel.  I do not believe they ever
> >     considered Unix and DEC, nor that AT&T considered
> >     selling to IBM. (AT&T had--fortunately--long since been
> >     rebuffed in an attempt to sell to DEC.)
> > 
> >     Doug
> > 
> 
> -- 
> voice: +1.512.784.7526       e-mail: sauer@technologists.com <mailto:sauer@technologists.com>
> fax: +1.512.346.5240         Web: https://technologists.com/sauer/
> Facebook/Google/Skype/Twitter <https://technologists.com/sauer/Facebook/Google/Skype/Twitter>: CharlesHSauer
> 
> 
> -- 
> Advice is judged by results, not by intentions.
>   Cicero
> 

--
voice: +1.512.784.7526       e-mail: sauer@technologists.com <mailto:sauer@technologists.com>           
fax: +1.512.346.5240         web: https://technologists.com/sauer/ <http://technologists.com/sauer/>
Facebook/Google/Skype/Twitter: CharlesHSauer


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5621 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-07  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-06 15:35 M Douglas McIlroy
2021-04-06 17:09 ` Clem Cole
2021-04-06 17:32   ` Charles H Sauer
2021-04-06 20:11     ` Josh Good
2021-04-06 20:26       ` Jim Capp
2021-04-06 20:47         ` Charles H Sauer
2021-04-07 16:42           ` Josh Good
2021-04-07 18:04             ` Charles H. Sauer
2021-04-07  2:49         ` Dave Horsfall
2021-04-07  6:04         ` arnold
2021-04-07 16:01           ` heinz
2021-04-06 21:06       ` Clem Cole
2021-04-07  0:58     ` heinz
2021-04-07  1:37       ` Warner Losh
2021-04-07  3:38         ` Dave Horsfall
2021-04-07  2:30     ` Ed Bradford
2021-04-07  2:44       ` Charles H. Sauer [this message]
2021-04-06 20:20   ` Boyd Lynn Gerber
2021-04-06 22:41 ` Dave Horsfall
2021-04-07  1:10   ` Jon Steinhart
2021-04-07  1:47     ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2021-04-07  1:49       ` Jon Steinhart
2021-04-07  1:58         ` Larry McVoy
2021-04-07  2:31           ` Serge Burjak
2021-04-09 21:24   ` Michael Parson
2021-04-10  3:33     ` Ed Bradford
2021-04-10 15:12       ` Clem Cole
2021-04-10 15:41         ` Larry McVoy
2021-04-07  0:59 Jason Stevens
2021-04-10 18:12 Paul Ruizendaal via TUHS

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10F81A21-AC7A-4644-A988-8E35F9216FEB@technologists.com \
    --to=sauer@technologists.com \
    --cc=egbegb2@gmail.com \
    --cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).