The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG (Michael Spacefalcon)
Subject: [TUHS] Bugs in V6 'dcheck'
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:14:25 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406020214.AA11094@ivan.Harhan.ORG> (raw)

A. P. Garcia <a.phillip.garcia at gmail.com> wrote:

> Were the original Unix authors annoyed when they learned that
> some irascible young upstart named Richard Stallman was determined to make
> a free Unix clone?

A deeper, more profound question would be: how did these original Unix
authors feel about their employer owning the rights to their creation?
Did they feel any guilt at all for having had to sign over all rights
in exchange for their paychecks?

Did Dennis and/or Ken personally wish their creation were free to the
world, public domain, or were they personally in agreement with the
licensing policies of their employer?  I argue that this question is
far more important than how they felt about RMS (if they cared at all).

Ronald Natalie <ron at ronnatalie.com> wrote:

> [RMS] If you read his earlier manifesto rants he hated UNIX =
> with a passion.
> Holding out the TOPS operating systems as the be-all and end-all of user =
> interface.

I wish more people would point out this aspect of RMS and GNU.  While
I wholeheartedly agree with Richard on the general philosophy of free
software, i.e., the *ethics* part and the Four Freedoms, when it comes
to GNU as a specific OS, in technical terms, I've always disliked
everything about it.  I love UNIX, and as Ron pointed it out like few
people do, GNU was fundamentally born out of hatred for the thing I
love.

SF



             reply	other threads:[~2014-06-02  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-02  2:14 Michael Spacefalcon [this message]
2014-06-02  2:51 ` John Cowan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-06-03 17:33 Nelson H. F. Beebe
2014-06-02  3:34 Noel Chiappa
2014-06-02  4:05 ` Mary Ann Horton
2014-06-02  6:12 ` arnold
2014-06-03 12:11 ` emanuel stiebler
2014-06-02  3:18 Noel Chiappa
2014-05-31 23:24 Doug McIlroy
2014-06-01  0:17 ` Kevin Schoedel
2014-06-01 22:54   ` scj
2014-06-01 23:48 ` A. P. Garcia
2014-06-02  1:11   ` Ronald Natalie
2014-06-02  2:10     ` A. P. Garcia
2014-06-03 16:38 ` Nelson H. F. Beebe
2014-05-31 15:55 Noel Chiappa
2014-05-31 16:18 ` Ron Natalie
2014-05-31 14:19 Noel Chiappa
2014-05-31 13:30 Norman Wilson
2014-05-31 16:03 ` John Cowan
     [not found]   ` <20140531161620.GL28034@mcvoy.com>
2014-05-31 17:16     ` John Cowan
2014-05-31 13:15 Noel Chiappa
2014-05-31 13:23 ` Ronald Natalie
2014-05-31 18:58 ` Tim Newsham
2014-05-31 19:48 ` Clem Cole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1406020214.AA11094@ivan.Harhan.ORG \
    --to=msokolov@ivan.harhan.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).