From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: random832@fastmail.us (random832@fastmail.us)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:34:21 -0500
Subject: [TUHS] Less -- was Termcap vs terminfo
In-Reply-To: <CAHYQbfDySuXHyYpsf=BZROia7VsiZDUUdAb-z5UoSQkEg-KyCA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201501110520.t0B5KwvP018801@coolidge.cs.dartmouth.edu>
 <1421091505.3373070.212956033.39DC72E0@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <CAHYQbfDySuXHyYpsf=BZROia7VsiZDUUdAb-z5UoSQkEg-KyCA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1421094861.3387032.212981065.1F9F4427@webmail.messagingengine.com>

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015, at 14:44, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
> srsly, this is why we have tmux.  or even good old screen, in a pinch.
> 
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man1/tmux.1?query=tmux&sec=1
> 
> each program small and good at its one own thing.

In principle, the functions "detachable terminal session", "terminal
session multiplexer", and "terminal with scrollback", and "translator
from a common VT100 superset to whatever the hell the user is using"
could be four separate programs.