From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: random832@fastmail.com (Random832)
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:32:24 -0500
Subject: [TUHS] Unix stories
In-Reply-To: <20170104163017.XtxbzN7PQ%steffen@sdaoden.eu>
References: <5257291ca0a0e1d80c646cab730129d589c5d707@webmail.yaccman.com>
 <42922C34-342F-4E86-83E2-3618129139B2@tfeb.org>
 <20170103004959.GA29088@mcvoy.com>
 <20170104130434.NQFzLGpVU%steffen@sdaoden.eu>
 <1483538831.1573798.837053385.2EB8CAC9@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <012e01d2669a$6b2f89c0$418e9d40$@ronnatalie.com>
 <1483545543.1599443.837188969.6EAAD62B@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <20170104163017.XtxbzN7PQ%steffen@sdaoden.eu>
Message-ID: <1483547544.1606930.837228297.014AB061@webmail.messagingengine.com>

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017, at 11:30, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> It is clear in assembler

The operation you described does not exist as a single-statement
construct in assembler for any architecture I'm familiar with.

> , and C was ment, as i understand it, as
> a higher-level portable abstraction of assembler.  Which alternate
> universe do you refer to?
> 
> --steffen