From: hellwig.geisse@mni.thm.de (Hellwig Geisse)
Subject: [TUHS] The evolution of Unix facilities and architecture
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 08:24:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494570272.2218.180.camel@mni.thm.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1705120736210.67621@aneurin.horsfall.org>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 710 bytes --]
On Fr, 2017-05-12 at 07:44 +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
> Am I the only one here who thinks that e.g. a char pointer should be
> "char* cp1, cp2" instead of "char *cp1, *cp2"? I.e. the fundamental
> type is "char*", not "char", and to this day I still write:
>
> char* cp1;
> char* cp2;
>
> etc, which IMHO makes it clear (which is every programmer's duty).
> I used to write that way in a previous life, and the boss didn't
> complain.
This view does not work well with more complicated
declarations like "void (*p)(int)". What is the
"fundamental type" here? One could argue that the
real culprit is the list construction, which does
not mix well with C declarations.
Hellwig
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-12 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 14:07 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-11 14:21 ` Larry McVoy
2017-05-11 16:17 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-11 17:11 ` Michael Kjörling
2017-05-11 21:44 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-11 22:06 ` Warner Losh
2017-05-12 6:24 ` Hellwig Geisse [this message]
2017-05-12 21:12 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-12 23:25 ` Hellwig Geisse
2017-05-11 16:15 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-11 16:52 ` Warner Losh
2017-05-11 17:12 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-11 20:37 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-11 22:25 ` Larry McVoy
2017-05-11 22:30 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-11 23:47 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-11 23:48 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-12 0:21 ` Larry McVoy
2017-05-12 2:42 ` Warner Losh
2017-05-12 0:16 ` Larry McVoy
2017-05-12 1:41 ` Wesley Parish
2017-05-12 1:05 ` Toby Thain
2017-05-12 8:17 ` Michael Kjörling
2017-05-12 13:56 ` Tim Bradshaw
2017-05-12 14:22 ` Michael Kjörling
2017-05-12 14:30 ` Larry McVoy
2017-05-12 15:11 ` Tim Bradshaw
2017-05-12 15:52 ` Chet Ramey
2017-05-12 16:21 ` Warner Losh
2017-05-12 8:15 ` Harald Arnesen
2017-05-14 4:30 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-05-14 17:40 ` Clem Cole
[not found] <mailman.1.1494986402.2329.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
2017-05-19 14:31 ` David
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-16 13:20 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-16 13:46 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-14 21:44 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-13 1:25 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-13 0:44 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-13 0:51 ` Random832
2017-05-13 0:55 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-13 1:17 ` Chris Torek
2017-05-13 15:25 ` Steve Simon
2017-05-13 16:55 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-13 17:19 ` William Pechter
2017-05-14 12:55 ` Derek Fawcus
2017-05-14 22:12 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-15 1:24 ` Nemo
2017-05-15 18:00 ` Steve Johnson
2017-05-16 22:33 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-16 23:13 ` Arthur Krewat
2017-05-16 23:18 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-13 23:01 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-12 23:30 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-12 23:38 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-12 23:52 ` Random832
2017-05-13 0:26 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-13 0:48 ` Random832
2017-05-13 0:22 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-13 0:23 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-12 18:43 Doug McIlroy
2017-05-12 18:56 ` Dan Cross
2017-05-12 19:43 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-12 20:06 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-12 20:40 ` Jeremy C. Reed
2017-05-12 21:29 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-12 21:29 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-12 15:12 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-12 15:17 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-12 15:18 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-12 15:46 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-11 17:08 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-11 21:34 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-10 14:08 Diomidis Spinellis
2017-05-10 14:38 ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2017-05-10 23:09 ` Erik Berls
2017-05-11 12:40 ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2017-05-11 0:49 ` Clem Cole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1494570272.2218.180.camel@mni.thm.de \
--to=hellwig.geisse@mni.thm.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).