[TUHS] Old Unix vulnerabilities

[TUHS] Old Unix vulnerabilities

[Dave Horsfall]

OK, I'll kick it off.

A beauty in V6 (and possibly V7) was discovered by the kiddies in Elec 
Eng; by sending a signal with an appropriately-crafted negative value (as 
determined from inspecting <user.h>) you could overwrite u.u_uid with 
zero...  Needless to say I scrambled to fix that one on my 11/40 network!

-- 
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU)  "Those who don't understand security will suffer."

[TUHS] Old Unix vulnerabilities

[Random832]

On Sat, May 13, 2017, at 19:34, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> OK, I'll kick it off.
> 
> A beauty in V6 (and possibly V7) was discovered by the kiddies in Elec 
> Eng; by sending a signal with an appropriately-crafted negative value (as 
> determined from inspecting <user.h>) you could overwrite u.u_uid with 
> zero...  Needless to say I scrambled to fix that one on my 11/40 network!

V7 fixes it by changing the if(sig >= NSIG) in psignal to cast it to
unsigned. Kill still doesn't validate its parameter until SysIII and
4BSD. PWB1 does not have the fix.

[TUHS] Old Unix vulnerabilities

[Random832]

On Sat, May 13, 2017, at 19:34, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> OK, I'll kick it off.

Oh, and since we're doing this... I independently noticed a buffer
overflow vulnerability in mkdir, and later discovered that someone else
had actually published a working exploit for the same bug... in 2004.

http://archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de/bugtraq/2004/06/msg00035.html

[TUHS] Old Unix vulnerabilities

[Tony Finch]

Random832 <random832 at fastmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017, at 19:34, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> >
> > A beauty in V6 (and possibly V7) was discovered by the kiddies in Elec
> > Eng; by sending a signal with an appropriately-crafted negative value (as
> > determined from inspecting <user.h>) you could overwrite u.u_uid with
> > zero...  Needless to say I scrambled to fix that one on my 11/40 network!
>
> V7 fixes it by changing the if(sig >= NSIG) in psignal to cast it to
> unsigned.

Even without that check V7 wouldn't be vulnerable. In V6, the
vulnerability occurs in psig() when the signal action is reset:

http://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V6/usr/sys/ken/sig.c

	rp = u.u_procp;
	n = rp->p_sig;
	rp->p_sig = 0;
	if((p=u.u_signal[n]) != 0) {
		u.u_error = 0;
		if(n != SIGINS && n != SIGTRC)
			u.u_signal[n] = 0;
		/* if n < 0 this can overwrite u.u_uid */

In V7, instead of a single pending signal, there is a bitmap of pending
signals, so the corresponding code is,

http://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7/usr/sys/sys/sig.c

	n = fsig(rp);
	if (n==0)
		return;
	rp->p_sig &= ~(1<<(n-1));
	if((p=u.u_signal[n]) != 0) {
		u.u_error = 0;
		if(n != SIGINS && n != SIGTRC)
			u.u_signal[n] = 0;
		/* always within the array bounds */

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Viking, North Utsire, South Utsire, Northeast Forties: Variable becoming
southeasterly 3 or 4, increasing 5 to 7, perhaps gale 8 later. Slight or
moderate becoming moderate or rough later. Fog patches, rain later. Moderate,
occasionally very poor.

[TUHS] Old Unix vulnerabilities

[Tim Newsham]

Here are some previously reported ones:

v1:
  http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/unix-jun72/2008-May/000126.html
  http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/unix-jun72/2008-May/000250.html

v7:
  http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2004/Jun/37


On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Dave Horsfall <dave at horsfall.org> wrote:

> OK, I'll kick it off.
>
> A beauty in V6 (and possibly V7) was discovered by the kiddies in Elec
> Eng; by sending a signal with an appropriately-crafted negative value (as
> determined from inspecting <user.h>) you could overwrite u.u_uid with
> zero...  Needless to say I scrambled to fix that one on my 11/40 network!
>
> --
> Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU)  "Those who don't understand security will
> suffer."
>



-- 
Tim Newsham | www.thenewsh.com/~newsham | @newshtwit | thenewsh.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20170518/4c4b64b5/attachment.html>