The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heinz Lycklama <heinz@osta.com>
To: tuhs@tuhs.org
Subject: [TUHS] Re: history of community help for unix users everywhere
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 13:34:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1522ddce-f2cc-7639-a17c-d0f9b87ef395@osta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfr67PnXV8gh0e60RKGJPbk_pcrwD260rDjbYmue9rQHcw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4178 bytes --]

The "open source" term may have been coined in 1998, but the term
"open systems" was in use well before in the mid to late 1980's when
we started the /usr/group and POSIX standards efforts. That was one
of the reasons why I named my high tech consultancy service with the
name "Open Systems Technology Associates" (OSTA) in 1992.

Heinz

On 2/8/2023 12:48 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:59 PM Clem Cole <clemc@ccc.com> wrote:
>
>     For those of us outside of BTL, i.e. the Academic users, "Unix
>     News" was created - which became ';login" - We started to meet
>     informally at a few universities and talk to each other.   Those
>     of us on the ArpaNet that email/FTP and the like, started to share
>     patches - but mostly things were shared when we got together via
>     magtape. When they were held in NYC, we might be lucky and someone
>     from Research might come (and even accidentally spill a few bits
>     on the floor that mix fix something).  Eventually, USENIX was
>     formed, and we met twice a year formally. That was so popular,
>     USENIX started having specialty conferences such as the one for C
>     and C++, LISA, Networking, Linux and Free Software, etc.
>     Similarly, with V7, UUCP was given to use a USENET was started by
>     Tom Truscott and his famous "auto-dialler" that he hacked with a
>     12v relay, a DR-11C and described at the Bolder USENIX
>     conference.   Netnews was not far behind - which sadly became
>     net.noise when the signal-to-noise ratio disappeared.
>
>
>  Yea, reading both the early usenix news letters and the early AUUG 
> newsletters carefully shows more community action as well. I'm not 
> sure what netnews was like in the 74-79 time frame before UUCP was 
> wisely available, so I can't comment on that, but there's reports from 
> names you'd recognize, and reports about USENIX conferences, reports 
> about local gatherings... and then all kinds of crazy stuff: letters 
> on university letter head that had bug fixes in it for this or that 
> problem... Addresses where you write and send photocopies of AT&T and 
> DEC licenses and get FORTRAN or MARCO-11 or other such things where 
> people had used their DEC source license to hack in unix I/O routines 
> into the FORTRAN compiler. And there were all kinds of 'user shared' 
> programs that ranged from 'trivial problem, poorly executed' to 
> 'really cool DEC OS emulators' depending on the era..  The bas.s that 
> is in V6 and V7 (V5 too?) is an early version fo DEC's BASIC that was 
> hacked for unix and some I/O devices that were specific to the labs... 
> there were also advice for what versions of unix to use, and what 
> versions were available to license. References to things that you 
> can't google for anymore (or if you do all you find is the google 
> index of the login issues / auus issues). There's also a number of 
> country SIGs under DECUS that were for unix in the 77 or so time frame 
> that might be good to search newsletters for... bitsavers has a bunch, 
> but not sure they are early enough (I didn't come across the 
> references to them until long after I looked at what bitsavers had).
>
> The community aspect of open source was there in spades as well, with 
> people helping other people and sharing fixes. But it was complicated 
> by restrictive license agreements and somewhat (imho) overzealous 
> protection of 'rights' at times that hampered things and would have 
> echos in later open source licenses and attitudes that would develop 
> in response. Even though the term 'open source' wasn't coined until 
> 1998, the open source ethos were present in many of the early computer 
> users groups, not least the unix ones. USENET amplified it, plus let 
> in the unwashed masses who also had useful contributions (in addition 
> to a lot of noise)... then things got really crowded with noise when 
> AOL went live... And I'm sure there's a number of other BBS and/or 
> compuserve communities I'm giving short-shrift here because I wasn't 
> part of them in real time.
>
> Warner

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6031 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-08 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-08 18:58 [TUHS] " Will Senn
2023-02-08 19:39 ` [TUHS] " segaloco via TUHS
2023-02-08 19:56   ` Will Senn
2023-02-08 20:01     ` Henry Bent
2023-02-08 20:02   ` Clem Cole
2023-02-08 19:57 ` Clem Cole
2023-02-08 20:00   ` Clem Cole
2023-02-08 20:17   ` Henry Bent
2023-02-08 20:48   ` Warner Losh
2023-02-08 21:28     ` Dan Cross
2023-02-08 21:34     ` Heinz Lycklama [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1522ddce-f2cc-7639-a17c-d0f9b87ef395@osta.com \
    --to=heinz@osta.com \
    --cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).