From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d79b42f5 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4420BA1A2B; Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:13:51 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DADA1A1A; Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:13:41 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=loomcom.com header.i=@loomcom.com header.b=RyMvKwPK; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=azYucKt9; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BA776A1A1A; Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:13:38 +1000 (AEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DBCA1A19 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:13:37 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F281B22013 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:13:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:13:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loomcom.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=LrsLaz86hV4hhU4Jdslh8hVsbcMWKhSvnQbJDG9PRkQ=; b=RyMvKwPK tr2UfYKxupT6FUFu3fFb9fjHsI5h5166CBXwqGUVQDiGYnuvhktmdAy87KEIwr7G KQp1M6wKueynyZyacvS/ryngwb4nF8fDtAlRsdlNc/PMIeq+Or/BcFL4g1ZKqenJ QDFTYFlMRVcn//WPoot4aM2IEaZeAXGp9pCXRu8P8RKlk4u1wlgp8rbR4E3Qb2lJ thwk+tSdR44HaKGZxm/xh2IU2VRT8jO0v3ppYOoLq0mjCgiMPLKnlI99ud5o5dhl JTCdv9ZAuC1JiPDGDcZeMfKdY2ZG24bLAhkR5Z9R1t10UWmCQ/b+IdT7WEY/LKYL VYI4MysbOgg3vw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=LrsLaz86hV4hhU4Jdslh8hVsbcMWK hSvnQbJDG9PRkQ=; b=azYucKt9nezRIgfEZx8oinPR70GRl2yPfYosrOYBi5BIB 5icRoLo6HiG/zXx8c17wjjO4/VpadB/RDF48u0lqpX5l/dgD548eHwTggEy2GgJ7 3oBQE0Z+4UeXrmNDt1xB8+fQTZ/oVjmgnxRItDorISO13EwviDeNjA7VaLWLqNSR b8iuowChoLR8KoHm3KkDpdKU3KYJ2zXfAFE4sDpM2GSaEy9uBJdXpeHrunL3W5wL mHU4cchhpwdcmjMz1NcTtQqtTv3zy2mctvwYdEWW6YydIvH7ZD8xpdBR3aA0LBqJ 7vqmVnmkNJNtk6WUdg0Ht0XGRvaApQbvQoPRPbIjg== X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 6BE1A621DD; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:13:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1535123616.1824656.1485063544.08BED1A8@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Seth Morabito To: TUHS main list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-7b72137a Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:13:36 -0700 Subject: [TUHS] Research UNIX on the AT&T 3B2? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" After the past several years of focusing on 3B2 preservation and emulation, I've begun to wonder whether 3B2 hardware was used very much inside of Bell Labs. Has anyone ever heard whether Research UNIX was ever ported to the WE32100? I've certainly never seen anything that would suggest it was, but I'd love to be proven wrong. -Seth -- Seth Morabito Poulsbo, WA web@loomcom.com