From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7170efe4 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id C4291A1F07; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:11:35 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03698A1A62; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:11:25 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=loomcom.com header.i=@loomcom.com header.b=fEzvqGUr; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=OSiAA/2K; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0E03DA1A62; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:11:24 +1000 (AEST) X-Greylist: delayed 383 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at minnie.tuhs.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:11:23 AEST Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5966FA1A26 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:11:23 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E373EE for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:04:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:04:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loomcom.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=wUSqL1vjbnkXdbFZIOwLi6cC4iso9 sCDohSrMGaD9qQ=; b=fEzvqGUrRY93c1nOq35wClvvEqGLDPurdac+F413XMBQ8 ixI7vYsM0TLeYqk9O26hPnS4K4QtohmHxUvn45RvptdZz3rK8zC/s5lhoe6MOG79 cOo1s5OpYUC4m9MFZiU7VUGc5JjJ1+fscm/53eiwh4HmJ6gyvCR9rBQgkW5aq9e+ 20/gWw/sLJa8y1SgXO+9RTLwlMaC7Vy+QxvoUQcXAq2M5hDtC9CIGpyIzk/Avbhr Bd/uodhZAcAt96pO37csgK9hUyyqHyQKK99QNgz9ZRJvlB20pcVh/NLAqDbpYzG+ wFzyEb1GQgwAQ9FS1ib4YfdibLibyzQfCjZyfLjrw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=wUSqL1 vjbnkXdbFZIOwLi6cC4iso9sCDohSrMGaD9qQ=; b=OSiAA/2KU+iMjwWhlECn6p 4Mi5XZ7PR+bqVA6b3jHbVgG+K29JkkKRYA56o/T5eREbzWdxl3eCJsg/KOw+dGSO CWZPnsG5koIZVRJNWuewmU0tPphyfgwZ4OGPmaLn7IY416VmnftWCUYME3BordvL 4+4AlQGdV1m0HpM+xabM+tSWmWOiBbYW9oOQx4J7XbbrZYlgwZcDY/tIFzyozYrS VxVwLQCC5iVOIBHdo5KX2fi6COhHlXRzetunPSXVkDoxyVY0aglvi9QRXqUv+GyM Xl7oAwg9/CA4+pYOjIxwd30qGQ8IvrZq66P9xbwGD7Yt0FNvU41rcRZogAqU1wTQ == X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 964F59E0F0; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1535565898.3905695.1490376112.4B7D3E18@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Seth Morabito To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-7b72137a In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 11:04:58 -0700 References: Subject: Re: [TUHS] =?utf-8?b?UmV0cm9OZXTigKY=?= X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Grant Taylor via TUHS wrote: > On 08/29/2018 07:46 AM, William Pechter wrote: > > Also... If you run on the internet remember documented security exploits > > are decades old. I recommend no open ports except for ssh if it will > > build and maybe UUCP. > > I'm working on a Retro Computing Networking project with a few other > people and I think it would be a benefit for things like running 4.3 BSD > and other old OSs in a relatively safe environment. > > I'm bringing this up on TUSH for two reasons: > > 1) I think THUS members could benefit from RetroNet > 2) I (we) would very much appreciate any suggestions or desires that > the THUS community would like to see in such a network. > > The idea behind RetroNet is two fold: > > 1) Create a network of interconnected VPNs between interested parties. > 2) Provide ISP like services over said interconnections. > > Our hopes are for RetroNet to be able to provide a sandbox / small pool > / isolated network where members can interconnect with each other (if > they want to) similar to the Internet, but with much less exposure. (We > are planing on RetroNet not having direct Internet connectivity.) We > are also hoping and planing to be able to carry any Ethernet based > traffic between sites, routed or not. > > I (we) would be very interested in any input that THUS members might be > able to provide. Particularly what you might like to see in such a network. Hmm. I hate to bring this up, but I've been using the name RetroNET as well. I've had the domain retronet.net registered for ages, and was about to launch a small pilot project with a handful of 3B2 emulators running SVR3, with the hope for many more interconnected systems. That said, maybe we could pool our efforts? I'd be happy to share the domain name with this effort, since it's precisely in line with what I'd like to see. -Seth -- Seth Morabito Poulsbo, WA web@loomcom.com