From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 6460 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2021 19:03:04 -0000
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 15 Jul 2021 19:03:04 -0000
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
	id F37769C869; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:02:57 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FE19C7F8;
	Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:02:30 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
 id AE7E59C7F1; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:02:27 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from oclsc.com (oclsc.com [206.248.137.164])
 by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F2139C7F0
 for <tuhs@tuhs.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:02:26 +1000 (AEST)
From: Norman Wilson <norman@oclsc.org>
To: tuhs@tuhs.org
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:01:08 -0400
Message-ID: <1626375671.1426.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] head/sed/tail (was The Unix shell: a 50-year view)
X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
Sender: "TUHS" <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>

Nelson H. F. Beebe:

  P.S. Jay was the first to get Steve Johnson's Portable C Compiler,
  pcc, to run on the 36-bit PDP-10, and once we had pcc, we began the
  move from writing utilities in Pascal and PDP-10 assembly language to
  doing them in C.

======

How did that C implementation handle ASCII text on the DEC-10?
Were it a from-scratch UNIX port it might make sense to store
four eight- or nine-bit bytes to a word, but if (as I sense it
was) it was C running on TOPS-10 or TOPS-20, it would have had
to work comfortably with DEC's convention of five 7-bit characters
(plus a spare bit used by some programs as a flag).

Norman Wilson
Toronto ON