From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: macbiesz@optonline.net (macbiesz@optonline.net)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:13:47 -0500
Subject: [TUHS] 32I status as of 17 Nov 2003
Message-ID: <185bd17fae.17fae185bd@optonline.net>

Perhaps v7upgrade would make a nice combination with the 32I kernel.

http://www.southern-storm.com.au/v7upgrade.html

Maciek

> >
> > 3. Gcc is tool chain unless someone wants to take on 32V 
> compiler.  May
> > take advantage of inline and asm in machine dependent files.
> >
> > I wouldn't recommend using the 32V compiler, mainly because there
> > are so many syntax changes, as well as newer compiler technology,
> > missing from it as to make it a very challenging project.
> 
> There are a couple of options here.  One is to use one of the 
> compilersfrom MIT that will match the code in 32V very closely.  
> You can google for
> these if they aren't already on Warren's site.  The other option
> is to use LCC.  I wouldn't use GCC if I were doing it.  (Of course 
> I'm not
> so these are just suggestions.)>