The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* where did `partition' come from?
@ 1999-09-05 22:30 norman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: norman @ 1999-09-05 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)


The sub-disks that one divide real disks into on UNIX systems are usually
called `partitions' these days.  But that's not what they were originally
called on UNIX:

- V7 hp(4) and rp(4) refer to `sections' and `pseudo-disks'.  32V hp(4)
refers to `portions' and `pseudo-disks.'  Later Research UNIX manuals,
once Section 4 was being edited again, settled on `sections.'

- System V Release 5.0 (the most recent system for which I have the device
driver part of the manual) also refers just to `sections.'  (So far as I
can remember, this convergence was a coincidence; I think I'm the one who
decided to use `sections' on the Research side, and I think I did so just
because it was the more graceful of the historic cases, though my memory
is not clear.)

- 3BSD and 4.0BSD follow 32V; in 4.1BSD, the term `partition' appears as well.

The System V preference for `section' lives on in the device naming scheme
on System-V-derived, but the documentation even on those systems just says
`partition' these days.

It looks to me like `partition' came in from the Berkeley world.  Does anyone
on the list remember where it came from?  Was the new term introduced on
purpose, or did it just creep in in the way language usually changes?

Norman Wilson
Occasional pursuer of arcana



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~1999-09-05 22:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-09-05 22:30 where did `partition' come from? norman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).